Answer:
$406,300
Explanation:
The computation of the cash collection is shown below:
Cash Collected From Customers is
= Ending account receivable +Revenue For the Year - opening account receivable
= $31,400 + $411,000 - $36,100
= $406,300
Answer:
$480,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what total relevant costs to make the part internally are
First step is to calculate Relevant cost per unit:
Relevant cost per unit:
Direct materials $6
Direct labor $24
Variable manufacturing overhead $12
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($15 × 0.40) $6
Relevant manufacturing cost $48
Now let determine the Total relevant costs to make the part internally
Total relevant costs to take the part internally=($48 × 10,000)
Total relevant costs to make the part internally = $480,000
Therefore total relevant costs to make the part internally are $480,000
Answer:
The correct answer is Any one of the five criteria specified by GAAP regarding accounting for leases.
Explanation:
According to the information in FAS 13, criteria for accounting for financial and operating leases must be followed, such that the asset must be recognized all the risks according to the property, considering the times of the lease and in other cases the future purchase options the which must be reasonably recorded. If these criteria are not met it should be classified as an operating lease.
As long as the rate of return is bigger than the inflation, the value and amount of money will increase and so will the purchasing power: the correct answer is "it will increase".
For example, if you invest 100 dollars, you will receive 108 dollars back, and you'd need 103 dollars to have the same value of money as before - but you have more.
Answer:
Should not be concerned
Explanation:
In the scenario being described, it can be said that the homeowner should not be concerned. That is because even though she did discriminate against the individual, Single-family homes rented without the use of a real estate agent or advertising are exempt from the federal Fair Housing Act. This holds true as long as the owner of the property does not own more than three homes at any given time. Therefore since there was no real estate agent, the man can't sue.
