Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
The animation gives you the capability to draw a specific path is custom path
<h3>What is an animation?</h3>
Animation is the diagmatic representation of a particular subject or idea in other to make the audience understand it.
After the animation is done, custom path allows it to be traceable in a system.
Therefore, the animation gives you the capability to draw a specific path is custom path
Learn more on custom path below,
brainly.com/question/20098799
#SPJ1
Answer:
Scientific method , hypothesis and theory is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
Scientific method:- The scientific method involves creating and making predictions based on evidence about the environment. It is described by its dedication to previous scientific world analysis and seeks to be unbiased, crucial, skeptical, and practical.
Hypothesis:- A hypothesis is a prediction of what is to be found at the result of a research study and is a national model on the partnership between various different factors studied in the studies.
Theory:- Social theory looks to interdisciplinarity, incorporating feedback from various academic fields to shed light on these complicated problems, and can draw on concepts from such diverse fields as geology and art history.
For me, I think it is C.<span> despite whether the plea resulted from threats or physical abuse, as long as the plea was understood. </span>
I believe the answer is: Integrative theory
Integrative theory view that society could never be exist unless each individuals fulfill their own roles. These happen because humans are unique in terms of our talent/capabilities. So in order to crate a well functioning society, different humans had to integrate our different capability to operate it.
