Explanation:
Constitution of Nepal 2015 (Nepali: नेपालको संविधान २०७२) is the present governing Constitution of Nepal. Nepal is governed according to the Constitution which came into effect on Sept 20, 2015, regarding the Interim Constitution of 2007.[1][2] The constitution of Nepal is divided into 35 parts, 308 Articles and 9 Schedules.
The Constitution was drafted by the Second Constituent Assembly following the failure of the First Constituent Assembly to produce a constitution in its mandated period after the devastating earthquake in April 2015. The constitution was endorsed by 90% of the total legislators. Out of 598 Constituent Assembly members, 538 voted in favor of the constitution while 60 people voted against it, including a few Terai-based political parties which refrained from the voting process.
Its institutions were put in place in 2010 and 2018 through a series of direct and indirect elections in all governing levels.
The answer is:
must be from a state whose electoral votes went to the Republican candidate in the preceding Presidential election
must come from a state where a majority of its Congressional members are Republicans
comes from a state that has a Republican governor
The republican national comittee was established in order to help republican candidates conduct their fund raising for the political campaign. In order to be a chairman for this organization, a person need to come from a republican dominated states and had similar principles with the republican party.
Answer:
Supremacy Clause
Explanation:
There are 3 clauses in Article 6. The most famous one or the second is known as the "supremacy clause" and basically sets the Constitution as something neither the states nor the federal government can void under any circumstances.
The Atlanta Campaign comprised a series of battles that took place during the summer of 1864 in the Western Theatre during the American Civil War.
John Bell Hood replaced Johnston as the leader of the Confederate forces. He was a recklessly aggresive leader who conducted several frontal attacks against the Union army and kept on constantly challenging his enemy. In the end, his army was besieged in Atlanta, and the result of this campaign was that it ended up setting the scenario for the Sherman's March to the Sea and the end of the war, with the victory of the Union.
Answer:
Baker argued that residents of his district were not receiving equal protection of the laws.
Tennessee argued that legislative redistricting was a political question that needed to be resolved by the legislative branch.
The case changed reapportionment of how people are represented throughout America.
Explanation:
Answered this question and got 100% :)