Question Options:
A) cause of action for breach of implied covenant of good faith.
B) retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
C) legitimate claim under bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ).
D) disparate impact employment discrimination.
Answer: retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
A retaliation claim involves an act whereby an employer treats an employee adversely when an employee alleges about any wrong, harassment or discrmination.
James was involved in whistleblowing which is the act whereby an individual passes information about a wrongdoing in an organisation. Based on this whistleblowing (reporting that particular batch of widgets did not meet the exacting requirements of the U.S) his boss demoted him( retaliation). Hence, James has a claim for retaliation.
Answer:
Other European countries quickly followed suit and began to explore and invade the New World. ... The Spanish conquistadors invaded areas of Central and South America looking for riches, ultimately destroying the powerful Aztec and Inca cultures.
It may cause other land that has been broken off to settle on another piece slowly building up
These explanations "make people feel safer and the
world more comprehensible".
The just-world hypothesis otherwise
called just world fallacy is the cognitive inclination or supposition that a
man's activities are innately disposed to convey ethically reasonable and
fitting results to that individual, to the finish of every honorable activity
being in the end compensated and every insidious activity inevitably rebuffed.
