Answer: FIXATION is an aggressive defense mechanism in which an individual keeps up a dysfunctional Behavior that obviously will not solve the conflict
Explanation: Fixation is when someone is fixed to an aggression that will not allow him or her to see reasons with the other person in a conflict. This is mostly seen when hard drug takers are aggrieved, it is always very difficult to calm them down, to see reasons and understand the other person. Fixation is also seen when someone has endured alot in a conflict, when such person becomes aggrieved in the conflict, the person is likely to be fixed with aggression. Any conflict that tends to be difficult to settle, the parties involved in the conflict must have been fixed to aggression.
I'm sorry, can you give more information?
If the Spanish had been able to invade and conquer England, Philip II would not have allowed religious tolerance for the protestants.
Philip II also known as “Philip the Prudent” was the King of Spain from 1556 to 1598. Under him, the Spanish empire flourished, expanded, and influenced in having religious unity. Madrid was established as the capital in his reign.
He established Religious unity by setting up the Holy league formed by Venice, Geneva, and the Papal states of Spain. The league aimed to defend Christianity against the Berber incursions in the Mediterranean and from the Ottoman empire. The King’s edicts limited the freedom in the use of their language, religion, and culture consequence of the rebellion of the Moors in the Granada al Bukhara.
Learn more about Philip II:
<u><em>https://brainly.in/question/6871626</em></u>
Answer:
Traditional and non mainstream cultural activities that are not financially driven are referred to as: <u>Folk culture</u>.
Explanation:
Folk culture refers to the set of artistic manifestations or cultural patterns of the popular classes. Folk culture includes all those cultural productions that are created and / or consumed by the lower or middle classes, that is, it refers to the forms of culture traditionally attributed to disadvantaged social classes. This designation is used to differentiate it from high culture, official or academic culture. Folk culture owes its existence to the multiplicity of relationships that coexist in a society and it is appreciated in the diversity of that or those unrepeatable characteristics and that in turn commune with traditions and unconventional activities / renovations generated in other environments.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
