Answer:
D and E
Step-by-step explanation:
3(23+18)=123
6(18)=108. 6(19)=114. 6(20)=120. 6(22)=132. 6(24)=144
A. Which reduction should she use so the picture fills as much of the frame as possible, without being too large?
Find the scale factor to get rom 7 1/3 inches to 5 1/3 inches:
5 1/3 / 7 1/3 = 0.7272
Now rewrite the fraction as decimals:
2/3 = 0.667
¾ = 0.75
5/9 = 0.555
The closest scale that would still fit the frame would be 2/3 because it is under 0.727.
B. How much extra space is there in the frame when she uses the reduction from Part A?
Multiply the original size by the scale factor to use:
7 1/3 x 2/3 = 4 8/9
Now subtract the scaled size from the original size:
7 1/3 – 4 8/9 = 2 4/9 inches extra
C. If she had a machine that could reduce by any amount, so that she could make the reduced picture fit in the frame exactly, what fraction would the reduction be?
Convert the scale from part A to a fraction:
0.72 = 72/99 which reduces to 8/11
Answer:
There is a 25.52% probability of observating 4 our fewer succesful recommendations.
Step-by-step explanation:
For each recommendation, there are only two possible outcomes. Either it was a success, or it was a failure. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this problem.
Binomial probability distribution
The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.
In which 
is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.
And p is the probability of X happening.
In this problem we have that:
If the claim is correct and the performance of recommendations is independent, what is the probability that you would have observed 4 or fewer successful:
This is
In which
There is a 25.52% probability of observating 4 our fewer succesful recommendations.
I hope this answers your question !
Answer:
ñ
Step-by-step explanation:
ññññññ
ñññññññññññññññññññññ
