Answer: Acquiring top talent and placing highly-qualified candidates into the right positions in your organization is already hard enough, but what happens when your business needs to do just that in the middle of a skilled labour shortage?
In fact, that's the challenge most organizations throughout the world are experiencing today.
Some 83 percent of businesses are struggling to find workers with the right skillsets, according to the Society for Human Resource Management. Meanwhile, a report by American Action Forum found employers in nearly every US state will face significant shortages in qualified workers by 2029.
The concern with a workforce skills shortage is something that is worrying businesses all over the world, and for good reason. Companies who aren't able to fill positions with skilled workers will be left with stretched resources that result in damaging implications for both the short-term and long-term outlook of the business.
Did you know, however, there are ways to address a skills shortage in your industry?
In this blog, HCMWorks has listed five ways that you can achieve your workforce targets even when there's a shortage in skilled workers in your industry.
Exploring Your Contingent Workforce Ecosystem
Explanation: Was this helpful?
Answer:
The first blank is <u>Essential nutrients</u>
The second blank is n/a (sorry)
The third blank is <u>Protein</u>
The forth blank is <u>Complex carbs</u>
The fifth blank is <u>carbohydrate and protein yield</u>
Explanation:
Hope this helps
-A Helping Friend (mark brainliest pls)
Answer:
bob is a criminal with head square-jawed face,keen eyes and a little white scar near his right eyebrows whereas jimmy is a crop
Answer:
Explanation:
Forehand groundstroke effectiveness is important for tennis success. Ball topspin angular velocity (TAV) and accuracy are important for fore hand groundstroke effectiveness, and have been extensively studied, previously; despite previous, quality studies, it was unclear whether certain racquet kinematics relate to ball TAV and shot accuracy during the forehand groundstroke. This study evaluated potential relationships between (1) ball TAV and (2) forehand accuracy, and five measures of racquet kinematics: racquet head impact angle (i.e., closed or open face), horizontal and vertical racquet head velocity before impact, racquet head trajectory (resultant velocity direction, relative to horizontal) before impact, and hitting zone length (quasi-linear displacement, immediately before and after impact). Thirteen collegiate-level tennis players hit forehand groundstrokes in a biomechanics laboratory, where racquet kinematics and ball TAV were measured, and on a tennis court, to assess accuracy. Correlational statistics were used to evaluate potential relationships between racquet kinematics, and ball TAV (mixed model) and forehand accuracy (between-subjects model; α = 0.05). We observed an average (1) racquet head impact angle, (2) racquet head trajectory before impact, relative to horizontal, (3) racquet head horizontal velocity before impact, (4) racquet head vertical velocity before impact, and (5) hitting zone length of 80.4 ± 3.6˚, 18.6 ± 4.3˚, 15.4 ± 1.4 m·s-1, 6.6 ± 2.2 m·s-1, and 79.8 ± 8.6 mm, respectively; and an average ball TAV of 969 ± 375 revolutions per minute. Only racquet head impact angle and racquet head vertical velocity, before impact, significantly correlated with ball TAV (p < 0.01). None of the observed racquet kinematics significantly correlated to the measures of forehand accuracy. These results confirmed mechanical logic and indicate that increased ball TAV is associated with a more closed racquet head impact angle (ranging from 70 to 85˚, relative to the ground) and increased racquet head vertical velocity before impact.
