1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
QveST [7]
3 years ago
8

Agnes works for STARQUEST LTD in the IT department. Her supervisor is Morges. Agnes is very good at her job and Morges fears thr

eatened by her. Over a period of several months he routinely criticizes her work and withholds information from her that she should have to do her job. Then he sends her emails telling her she has missed deadlines and committed other errors. Agnes tries to defend herself but this only angers Morges. The last straw for Agnes was Morges telling her she would be better off at home "taking care of her husband." Agnes complains to HR about Morges' conduct. STARQUEST LTD could be liable to Agnes for Morges' conduct under which of the following doctrines?
a. parens patriae.
b. res ipsa loquitur.
c. respondeat superior.
d. fairness doctrine.
Business
1 answer:
Goshia [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is "Option c".

Explanation:

The whole teaching requires its principal (StarQuest ltd) to also be held liable for only certain acts unless the agent or worker speaks up which damages or injury. From the above case, Morges' behavior is inaccurate as well as the corporation is responsible for its behavior.

  • Parens patriae is indeed a principle that covers State intervention whenever a negligent parent is involved.
  • Res ipsa loquitor is indeed a principle which, throughout the absence of evidence, makes misconduct or perhaps an accident as 'negligence.'
  • In the fairness doctrine is concerned with both the transmission of contentious news not with the liability of even an undertaking for its conduct.
You might be interested in
A shortsighted view of customer interaction shows that:
shusha [124]
A shortsighted view of customer interaction shows that: You should figure that a customer calls or comes in, service is provided and then the customer goes away
Shortsighted view customer interaction refers to the way we describe an ideal customer interaction in a simplistic way.
Every good sales person have been trained to spot what the customer need and how to influence that customer to choose the product that will bring the most profit to the business.<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Other things remaining​ equal, the law of demand says that higher prices will lead to a A. smaller quantity demanded and lower p
Yuri [45]

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

Other things remaining​ equal, the law of demand says that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price the higher the quantity demanded.

Suppose a good is being sold at $5 and 20 quantities are being demanded, if the price increases to $6, lesser of that goods should be demanded

7 0
4 years ago
Tv hosts for the “make me a millionaire” game show?
yulyashka [42]
I would do make me a millionaire
6 0
3 years ago
Purchases Budget Rest Inn provides four-star accommodations for the vacation traveler. It is located just off a major interstate
natita [175]

Answer:

2,340

Explanation:

The computation of purchase to be made on July is shown below:-

Particulars                                   June            July            August

Sales                                            2,300           2,500           2,100

Add: Closing Inventory                1,000            840  

(40% of next month)

Less: Opening Inventory                                  1,000           840

(Closing of previous month)

Purchases to be made                3,300           2,340        1,260

Therefore the purchase to be made on July is 2,340

3 0
3 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A(n) _____ gets learners into the appropriate mental state for learning and allows them to understand the personal and work-rela
    8·1 answer
  • Assume that you have an outstanding 100M loan with your bank under which you pay 5% fixed rate. Assume also that you have entere
    9·1 answer
  • ________ are sets of interdependent organizations participating in the process of making a product or service available for use
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that cigarette smokers create a negative externality. Further suppose that the government imposes a tax on cigarettes eq
    13·2 answers
  • To save time, try a test solution after your first interview
    8·1 answer
  • The average of first 10 even number is​
    8·2 answers
  • Heuser Industries recently projected the following data (in thousands) for a coming year. The dividend payout is expected to be
    8·1 answer
  • Wht is yall favorite subject
    6·2 answers
  • Most leadership training programs concentrate on developing, maintaining, or enhancing individual attributes. this most accurate
    5·1 answer
  • Amfac Company manufactures a single product. The company keeps careful records of manufacturing activities from which the follow
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!