In the given question Laura has $30 to spend on food for the week.
According to the question we have to set the inequality between total amount and amount spent on food.
Amount spend by Laura on food for the week = $30
Let the amount spent by Laura on food be x
So she has to spend up to $30
So inequality will be 
So option b is the answer
Answer: 9 + 2/x - x = -19
Answer:
e. reject the null hypothesis the p value is less than 0.05. therefore the difference is significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
given that after comparing response times between the audio and picture portions of the MIT test, the t-test resulted in a t-value of 2.97.
test statistic t = 2.97
Sample size n =250
Critical value of t at 95% is 1.96
We find that test statistic absolute value is greater than 1.96
So p value would be less than 0.05
This implies that null hypothesis stands in the rejected region.
So reject null hypothesis would be correct conclusion. Sample size cannot be said to be small as more than 30 itself is a good sample size.
e. reject the null hypothesis the p value is less than 0.05. therefore the difference is significant.
The answer is X = 1 and Y = -4.
Answer:
Each hotdog costs $1.65
Each juice drink costs $1.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's begin by letting 
represent the number of hot dogs and 
the number of juice drinks.
The Baxter family bought 6 hot dogs and 4 juices for $14.10.
The Farley family bought 3 hot dogs and 4 juices for $9.15.
Now, we subtract these equations.
Since has reversed coefficients, it gets eliminated. Now solve for x.
NOW, we find y by substituting x with 1.65 (in either equation).
We'll use the first equation.
= 1.65
= 1.05
represents hotdogs and represents juice drinks.
Therefore, each hotdog costs $1.65 and each juice drink costs $1.05.
<em> I hope this helps! :)</em>
