Rewrite 5 3/7 as an improper fraction.

Why isn't 9 divisible by 5622

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

It is. Only you dont get a whole number.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Kelly has $100 she received for her birthday She saves $10 each week from doing chores Which function can be used to find t the

LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

$620 every year

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the question didn't specify how long she would have to save for, let's just assume that it's one year. There are 52 weeks in a year which is $520, and on her birthday she would have an extra $100, so every year she saves $620 in total.

8 0

3 years ago

7. Are the ordered pairs below an arithmetic sequence or geometric

DochEvi [55]

Answer:

8. Arithmetic Progression

9. $f(9) = 300$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$\{(1,55)\ (2, 45)\ (3, 35)\ (4, 25)\}$

Solving (8): Arithmetic or Geometric

We start by checking if it is arithmetic by checking for common difference (d).

$d = y_2 - y_1 = y_3 - y_2 = y_4 - y_3$

This gives:

$d = 45 - 55 = 35 - 45 = 25 - 35$

$d = -10 = -10 = -10$

$d=-10$

<em>Because the common difference is equal, then it is an arithmetic progression</em>

Solving (8):

$f(n) = f(1) + f(n-1)$

To find f(9), we substitute 9 for n

$f(9) = f(1) + f(9-1)$

$f(9) = f(1) + f(8)$

We need to solve for f(8); substitute 8 for n

$f(8) = f(1) + f(8 - 1)$

$f(8) = f(1) + f(7)$

We need to solve for f(7); substitute 7 for n

$f(7) = f(1) + f(7 - 1)$

$f(7) = f(1) + f(6)$

We need to solve for f(6); substitute 6 for n

$f(6) = f(1) + f(6 - 1)$

$f(6) = f(1) + f(5)$

We need to solve for f(5); substitute 6 for n

$f(5) = f(1) + f(5 - 1)$

$f(5) = f(1) + f(4)$

From the function, f(4) = 25 and f(1) = 55.

So:

$f(5)=55 + 25$

$f(5)=80$

$f(6) = f(1) + f(5)$

$f(6) = 55 + 80$

$f(6) = 135$

$f(7) = f(1) + f(6)$

$f(7) = 55 + 135$

$f(7) = 190$

$f(8) = f(1) + f(7)$

$f(8) = 55 + 190$

$f(8) = 245$

$f(9) = f(1) + f(8)$

$f(9) = 55 + 245$

$f(9) = 300$

8 0

3 years ago

Prove that if AC=DF and AB=DE then BC=EF

Step2247 [10]

In triangle ABC and DEF
AC =DF, [ given ]
AB =DE, [ given ]
angle A = angle D
by SAS
ABC congruent to triangle DFE
so
BC = EF, [ CPCTC]
hence proved

8 0

2 years ago

A random sample of 144 recent donations at a certain blood bank reveals that 81 were type A blood. Does this suggest that the ac

Reptile [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.4$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.4$

$z=\frac{0.5625 -0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.4(1-0.4)}{144}}}=3.98$

$p_v =2*P(z>3.98)=0.0000689$

Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true percent of people with type A of blood is significantly different from 0.4 or 40%

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=144 represent the random sample taken

X=81 represent the number of people with type A blood

$\hat p=\frac{81}{144}=0.5625$ estimated proportion of people with type A blood

$p_o=0.4$ is the value that we want to verify

$\alpha=0.01$ represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

$p_v{/tex} represent the p value Hypothesis to testWe want to test if the percentage of the population having type A blood is different from 40%.: Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.4$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.4$

the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the info given we got:

$z=\frac{0.5625 -0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.4(1-0.4)}{144}}}=3.98$

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:

$p_v =2*P(z>3.98)=0.0000689$

Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true percent of people with type A of blood is significantly different from 0.4 or 40%

3 0

3 years ago