Not sure if this is correct orty-five states and the District of Columbia levy general sales taxes that apply (with some exemptions) to all goods and certain services. Thirty-seven states (including, Alaska, which has no state tax) also allow general sales taxes at the local level. Most states apply separate sales taxes to particular goods, including tobacco, alcohol, and motor fuels.
Answer:
no it's not necessary to make all the things public
The Civil rights pioneer known as Clyde Kennard made public his attempts to enroll at Mississippi southern college<u> </u><u>by writing a </u><u>letter </u><u>to the local </u><u>newspaper</u><u>.</u>
Clyde Kennard was a civil rights pioneer who tried to enroll at Mississippi southern college in an act of rebellion against segregation. In his attempt to end <em><u>segregation</u></em>, Kennard tried to become the first African American to attend Mississippi Southern College, which<em> greatly angered local people of the region. </em>
Kennard made public his attempts by <em><u>writing a highly detailed </u></em><em><u>letter </u></em><em><u>to the </u></em><em><u>local newspaper </u></em><em><u>"The Hattiesburg American".</u></em> This resulted in a personal attack against Kennard's character in an attempt to defame him and refuse his application, which they otherwise had no obvious reason to deny.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/25409330?referrer=searchResults
The answer is that assimilation is considered to be less
harsh than paternalism due to the fact that assimilation still enables a
country to adopt various cultures, and makes equality, while in paternalism, it
is considered to make a country lesser, or less a country. Paternalism refers
to the practice or policy of government bodies that restricts freedom and
responsibilities of those subordinate to them in the subordinates.
This law is called Double Jeopardy.
Although this may seem beneficial and fair, it also has several disadvantages. The law is beneficial to innocent people, because it prevents them from being tried twice for the same crime, so they can not be acquitted and then later found guilty. However, this is also a disadvantage in some cases. In the past, there have been some court cases in which the defendant was acquitted, but later admitted to the crime. Because of the Double Jeopardy law, these people could not be found guilty and still have not received a punishment.