First, the bigger square's area is 20*20= 400 cm^2
second, the circle's area is ¶r^2 = ¶(20/2)^2 = ¶(10)^2 = 100¶ cm^2
third, smaller square-- if we imagine it as 4 parts as 4 right triangles-- 1 part will be 1/2*(20/2)(20/2) = 1/2 (10)(10) = 50 cm^2 then the area of the smaller square is 4*50 = 200 cm^2
so the shaded parts = circle - smaller square =100¶ - 200 cm^2
the answer is 2
9514 1404 393
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The interval of interest becomes the limits of integration. ∆x becomes dx, and the xi are replaced by the variable of integration, x.
Answer:
Step 1: Set the expression inside the square root greater than or equal to zero. Step 2: Solve the equation found in step 1. In this case, we divided by a negative number, so had to reverse the direction of the inequality symbol. Step 3: Write the answer using interval notation.
The test statistic z will be equal to -0.946 and it shows that there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Given sample sizes of 833 and 386 and result of samples 434 and 189.

Proportion of full time=434/833=0.52
Proportion of part time=189/386=0.49.
Difference in proportion =0.52-0.49
TTF- i∈ rho=0
TTF+i∈ rho≠0.
Mean of difference=0.03
Z=(X-μ)/σ
σ=
=0.0317
σ=0.0317
z=(0-0.03)/0.0317
=-0.03/0.0317
=-0.317
p value will be =0.1736.
Because p value is greater than 0.01 so we will accept the null hypothesis which shows that there is no significant difference in the proportions.
Hence there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4
In the first bag, picking a black marble would be impossible.
The second bag would be likely.
The third bag would be unlikely.
hope this helps!