The correct option is D.
The model developed by Ptolemy has a lot of inconsistency and during the middle age additional explanation was offered for the claims made by the model. The model was very complicated because it was based on erroneous assumptions.
Copernicus model was simpler and some of his claims were correct.<span />
A.) <span>If no unbalanced force acts upon the house of cards, then it will remain standing forever.
[ Other Statements doesn't make any sense in Physics, they can be true in some situation & can't be false, option A is the only answer ]
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
A shorter than the original source and in the researcher's words
Explanation:
The summary is an abridged version of the original source and in the researcher's own very words.
Summaries gives an over-arching perspective and excludes implicit details from a given text.
A summary should not be detailed and must avoid overt illustrations. They must capture the true essence of piece leaving out flowery details.
A summary should be lesser in length than the original piece. Any third party reader should immediately be able to grab the details of the original piece from the summary.
I can't answer this question without a figure. I've found a similar problem as shown in the first picture attached. When adding vectors, you don't have to add the magnitudes only, because vectors also have to factor in the directions. To find the resultant vector C, connect the end tails of the individual vectors.
<em>The red line (second picture) represents the vector C.</em>
