1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
6

Please only if you know!!

Social Studies
2 answers:
hjlf3 years ago
7 0
The answer is B because it's saying how he would basically sacrifice his life for his country meaning he is a devoted American
aev [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B

Explanation: Getting in the service for your country is risking your life. You can lose a lot if you die or get injured out on the battlefield your family, friends. He is willing to make this sacrifice to fight for America. Thus he is a devoted American.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
What percentage of rocks within Earth's history are almost completely devoid of fossils?
mestny [16]

Answer:

88% of rocks are almost completely devoid of fossils

Explanation:

Precambrian era which means "Before the Cambrian period". Geologists have found that there are some hard to discern fossils in some Precambrian rocks. Precambrian covers almost 90% of the entire history of the Earth whereby 88% of rocks are almost completely devoid of fossils which has been divided into three eras: The Hadean, The Archean and The Proterozoic

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the problems that dual purpose evaluations present for a forensic psychologist. What is the primary advantage of this p
Liula [17]

Forensic psychology is that the branch of psychology concerned with the assembly and application of psychological knowledge and principles within the legal process.

Although forensic psychology could be a relatively young discipline, psychology and law are intertwined since the dawn of recorded history. Today there's hardly a region of the law where psychological expert testimony isn't being implemented and there is little doubt that forensic psychology has made significant contributions to the execution of justice.

Unfortunately, many experts rely exclusively upon an unstructured clinical opinion when assessing a defendant, which is actually a "gut feeling." it's very subjective and not advised by today's standards. Research has shown that the likelihood of being correct isn't any better than chance.

Although an unstructured clinical opinion is taken into account the worst method in terms of reliability and validity, it's the foremost commonly used method for assessing areas like risk of violent recidivism.

Some of the responsibilities of forensic psychologists include:

  • Working within family courts to assist resolve child custody issues, investigate abuse, provide psychotherapy, and assess visitation risks
  • Assessing the mental competency of defendants and their fitness to face trial within criminal courts
  • Providing opinions a couple of defendant’s psychological state, serving as an witness, and sometimes offering psychotherapy services to the victims of crime
  • Working as a consultant for the defense or for the prosecution in a very criminal case
  • Conduct research and review previous research on topics associated with forensic psychology

Study criminology to realize a stronger understanding of why people break the law. Forensic Psychology helps to assess risk for violence and may help courts make appropriate decisions on sentencing, granting privileges, and community reintegration. If a private is assessed to be a high risk for future violence, a judge has grounds to order more restrictive protection.

To learn more about forensic psychologist:

brainly.com/question/4622068

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
You are surfing the internet and find a new computer game that looks pretty cool. The website asks you to read through the condi
maria [59]

Answer: They could sue, ban you from the game, or give you a warning

Explanation:

Hope THIS hElPs!

4 0
2 years ago
This ruling violated the recent
sammy [17]

Answer:

Maybe this will help

Explanation:

In a case later overruled by West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Supreme Court held in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940), that state legislatures could require public school students to salute the U.S. flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance without violating students’ speech and religious rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.Minersville students refused to salute the flag for religious reasons

Public school students in Minersville, Pennsylvania, were required to begin the school day by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while saluting the flag. However, two students, Lillian and William Gobitas (a court clerk erroneously changed the family’s last name to Gobitis), refused. They claimed that such a practice violated their religious principles; they were members of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who believed that saluting the flag was tantamount to paying homage to a graven image. After the students were expelled from school, their father filed suit, claiming that his children were being denied a free education and challenging the required pledge. Both the district court and the court of appeals ruled that the required salute and pledge were unconstitutional.

Court upheld compulsory salute and pledge

In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court overruled the lower courts by upholding the compulsory salute and pledge. Writing for the Court, Justice Felix Frankfurter acknowledged that the First Amendment sought to avoid the “bitter religious struggles” of the past by prohibiting the establishment of a state religion and guaranteeing the free exercise of all religions. Yet the scope of this right to religious liberty could pose serious questions when, as in this case, individuals sought exemption from a generally applicable and constitutional law.

Citing a series of cases, beginning with the Court’s decision upholding anti-polygamy laws in Reynolds v. United States (1879), Frankfurter reaffirmed the principle that religious liberty had never included “exemption from doing what society thinks necessary for the promotion of some great common end, or from a penalty for conduct which appears dangerous to the general good.” In this case, the “great common end” was achieved through repetition of a “cohesive sentiment” represented by the salute and pledge to the flag, “the symbol of our national unity” that transcended all other differences.

Frankfurter defined the question in Gobitis as whether the Supreme Court could decide “the appropriateness of various means to evoke that unifying sentiment without which there can ultimately be no liberties, civil or religious,” or whether that decision should be left to the individual state legislatures and school districts. For Frankfurter and the majority of the Court, the decision obviously belonged to the legislatures and school boards. Although multiple methods were available for instilling “the common feeling for the common country” and some of those methods “may seem harsh and others no doubt are foolish,” it was for the legislatures and educators to decide, not the Court. The Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to become “the school board for the country.”

Stone said the compelled pledge should be unconstitutional

In his dissent, Justice Harlan Fiske Stone presaged the Court’s opinion three years later in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) that would overrule the Gobitis decision. Conceding that constitutional guarantees of personal liberty are “not always absolutes,” Stone wrote that when legitimate conflicts arise between liberty and authority, the Court should seek “reasonable accommodation between them so as to preserve the essentials of both.” The Constitution did not indicate in any way that “compulsory expressions of loyalty play any . . .

8 0
3 years ago
NEED ANSWER ASAP!!! What was one major result of Joseph Stalin’s economic policies? A. immediate economic growth B. widespread s
Virty [35]

Answer:

D. spread of the great depression to russia

Explanation:

i literally had a test over this exact subject tdy and their were questions like these. thats the answer buddy trust me.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In what type of plea bargain does the defendant plead guilty to a less serious offense than the one charged?​
    11·2 answers
  • When two cars arrive at an intersection at the same time, which one has the right-of-way?
    7·1 answer
  • Helen has been selected to serve on a jury. She has heard about the case on the news and is excited to be involved in such a big
    5·2 answers
  • What was the primary focus of Nazi propaganda in the 1930s?
    5·1 answer
  • Because the mortgage conveys a complex claim for a long period of time, clauses are included in anticipation of possible future
    8·1 answer
  • What is the difference between canals and rivers?
    12·1 answer
  • Even though Mexico became independent in 1821, people of Spanish origin still held most of the power. In fact, even though they
    8·1 answer
  • If someone has integrity, they __________.
    13·2 answers
  • ANYONE PLZZZZ HELP ME THIS IS DO TODAY I GIVE COOKIE IF U DO IT ANYTHING PLZZZI WILL GET NX 0 PLZ =(
    9·2 answers
  • Picture is down below ⬇ I need 2 answers so I can mark one brainliest who ever gives a better explanation I'll mark brainliest.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!