Answer:
please stop all this love comments
Step-by-step explanation:
okk? that will be better
Sequence: -4, 8, -16
rate of increase: -16/8 = -2
If you make A1 the first term in the sequence you must use (n-1) in the explicit formula. If you go backwards in the sequence to find A0 = 2 then you would use n.
The don't have A0 = 2 listed as an option so we use A1 = -4 and (n-1) terms.
An = -4(-2)^(n-1)
Solving for the 5th term A5, use n = 5
A5 = -4(-2)^(5-1)
A5 = -4(16)
A5 = -64
So the answer is B.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:iii
Answer:
C. 7
Step-by-step explanation:
Therefore, by Basic Proportionality theorem:
No because 6 multiplied by 10 is 60 and 6 multiplied by 11 is 66
