Answer:
K = 0.2
Explanation:
Based on the chemical dissociation of N₂O₄:
N₂O₄ ⇄ 2NO₂
The equilibrium constant, K, of the reaction is:
K = [NO₂]² / [N₂O₄]
Now, if 20% of N₂O₄ is dissociated, 80% remains as N₂O₄ = 0.8mol/L = 0.8M
as 20% is dissociated, 0.2moles of N₂O₄ were dissociated and 0.2*2 = 0.4mol/L of NO₂ are produced.
Replacing in K:
K = [0.4M]² / [0.8M]
<h3>K = 0.2</h3>
Answer:
atoms relative motion slow down and begin to vibrate in place
As thermal energy increases and there is more particle movement.
- Thermal energy is the energy possessed by the system or object due to the movement of its particles.
- For example kinetic energy of the particles
- Higher the motion of the particles more will be the thermal energy of the system or object and vice-versa
- It is also termed as heat energy of a system or object
- The higher the thermal energy, the higher will be the temperature and vice versa.
So, from this, we can conclude that as thermal energy increases and there is more particle movement.
Learn more about thermal energy here:
brainly.com/question/21162439?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/11278589?referrer=searchResults
First. moles is just a label for a number of things. just like a
dozen = 12, a gross = 144, a mole = 6022 with another 20 zeros after the
2
next
moles = mass / molecular weight.
molecular weight = sum of atomic mass from the periodic table
atomic mass MnO2 = atomic mass Mn + 2 x atomic mass O
= 54.94 + 2 x 16 = 86.94 g/mole
so moles MnO2 = 98.0 grams / (86.94 g/mole) = 1.13 moles
notice that I only gave 3 digits? that because of sig figs read the link below if you don't understand....
mw C5H12 = 5 x 12 + 12 x 1 = 72 g/mole
so moles C5H12 = 12.0 g / 72.0 g/mole = 0.167 moles
mw XeF6 = 131.3+ 6 x 19.00 = 245.3
so moles XeF6 = 100 g / 245.3 g/mole = 0.4077 moles
I've also provided a link to a periodic table. if you need atomic weights click on any element and it will give you the
details.
Answer:
Samira's model correctly demonstrates how the properties changed with the rearrangement of the atoms. However not all atoms are accounted for. There is a missing reactant.
Explanation:
Samira's model correctly demonstrated how the atoms in two compounds reacted to form two new products. However, the elements present in the reactants side should be the elements that make up the new products in the product side. But as the diagram shows, Sameera has mistakenly added a new element to one of her products which will be wrong.
