1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
3 years ago
11

The Big Black Bird Company​ (BBBC) has a large order for special​ plastic-lined military uniforms to be used in an urgent milita

ry operation. Working the normal two shifts of 40hours each per​ week, the BBBC production process usually produces 2 comma 600uniforms per week at a standard cost of ​$125each. 72 employees work the first shift and 32the second. The contract price is ​$240per uniform. Because of the urgent​ need, BBBC is authorized to use​ around-the-clock production six days per week. When each of the two shifts works 72hours per​ week, production increases to 3 comma 800 uniforms per week but at a cost of ​$152 each.
a. Did the multifactor productivity ratio increase, decrease or remain the same? If it changed, by what percentage did it change?
b. Did the labor productivity ratio increase decrease or remain the same? If it changed, by what percentage did it change?
c. Did weekly profits increase decrease, or remain the same?
Business
1 answer:
zysi [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

first we must calculate the original value of the goods produced = $240 x 2,600 = $624,000

original cost = $125 x 2,600 = $325,000

original amount of labor used = (72 + 32) x 40 = 4,160 hours

value of goods after change = 3,800 x $240 = $912,000

cost after change = 3,800 x $152 = $577,600

labor used after change = (72 + 32) x 72 = 7,488 hours

a) original multifactor productivity = $624,000 / $325,000 = $1.92 per dollar spent

multifactor productivity after change = $912,000 / $577,600 = $1.58 per dollar spent

multifactor productivity decreased by 17.71%

b) original labor productivity = $624,000 / 4,160 hours = $150 per labor hour

labor productivity after change = $912,000 / 7,488 hours = $121.79 per labor hour

labor productivity decreased by 18.81%

c) change in weekly profits = ($912,000 - $577,600) - ($624,000 - $325,000 = $35,400 increase

You might be interested in
A U.S. bank has £120 million in loans to corporate customers and has £70 million in deposits it owes to customers with the same
postnew [5]

Answer:

£30 million

Explanation:

Banks net exposure serves as the the money currently owned by the bank.

Credit to bank;

Loans to corporate customers is bank's money since customers will repay the loan back to the bank even with interest = £120 million

Total credit owned by the bank =

£120 million

Debit;

Deposit owned to customers = £70 million (It is customers money not bank's)

Money sold forward by bank is also going out of banks pocket (debit) =£20 million

Total debt owned by bank = £70 million+£20 million = £90 million

Bank's net exposure = Total credit - debt owned by bank

Banks net exposure = £120 million - £90 million

= £30 million

6 0
3 years ago
Lisa Richter deposited $5,000 at 4% compounded semiannually for three years. At the beginning of the fourth year, Lisa deposited
Contact [7]

Answer:

Answer is option (d) $8,424

Explanation:

The total amount Lisa Richter will receive after the end of the first 3 years can be expressed using the formula for calculating the total amount after 3 years with interest compounded semiannually is as follows;

A = P (1 + r/n)^(nt)

where;

A = the future value of the initial investment

P = initial investment amount/principal amount

r = the annual interest rate

n = the number of times that interest is compounded per unit t

t = the time the money is invested for

In our case;

P=$5,000

r=4/100=0.04

n=interest is compounded semiannually which is twice a year=2

t=3 years

Replacing values in the formula;

A=5,000(1+0.04/2)^(2×3)

A=5,000(1+0.02)^6

A=5,000(1.02)^6

A=$5,630.81

Total amount after the end of the first 3 years=$5,630.81

To calculate the total principal amount for the fourth year;

Total principal amount=Total amount after 3 years+Amount deposited at the beginning of the fourth year

where;

Total amount after 3 years=$5,630.81

Amount deposited at the beginning of the fourth year=$2500

replacing;

Total principal amount=(5,630.81+2500)=8,130.81

Using the formula;

A = P (1 + r/n)^(nt)

P=$8,130.81

r=4/100=0.04

n=compounded semiannually=2

t=1 year

replacing;

A=8,130.81(1+0.04/2)^(2×1)

A=8,130.81(1.02)^2

A=8,459.29

Option (d)  $8,424 is closer to 8,459.29, take answer as (d) $8,424

7 0
3 years ago
The statement of shareholders’ equity reports the transactions that cause changes in its shareholders’ equity account balances.
vazorg [7]

Answer:

B) the issuance of bonds.

Explanation:

Equity which represents the amount owed to the owners of the business includes retained earnings (which is the accumulation of the net income/loss over the years less dividends paid) and common shares.

As such, the sale of additional shares of stock, net income and declaration of dividend are typical reasons for changes in shareholder's equity however, the issuance of bonds is a liability (usually non-current).

6 0
3 years ago
Vinny and Sandra have just had their first baby, and need to make a decision about how to handle work and child‑care responsibil
mr_godi [17]

Answer:

A. 600

B. 0

C. 0

D. -1100

E. -1000

Explanation:

For part A you are asked to find the change in GDP with the addition of paying a babysitter $600. The GDP beforehand was the total income from both Vinny and Sandra which is $1200 + $1000 = $2200. For these questions, you are being asked to find a change in GDP which would simply be the addition of $600. Similiary, for part B there is no change in GDP because they do not pay Sandra's mother, so the change in GDP is 0. For part C, since the payments are not reported, there is no change in GDP. Part C can be thought of as a reference to the shadow market and GDP from the shadow market is not recorded. Part D has a negative 1100 because they each go back to work part-time, Vinnie earning $500 per week and Sandra earning $600. The change in GDP would be negative because they are losing 1100 in order to care for a new child. For part E, Vinnie gives up all his income which would normally amount to $1000 per week. The change in GDP is therefore negative.

6 0
3 years ago
Considering your program options is step _______________ of the planning process.
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Considering your program options is STEP TWO of the planning process. 
The planning process is made up of five steps, which are:
1. determine your personal goals
2.consider your program options
3. Set SMART goals; that is, let your goals be specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timely 
4.Structure your program and document it
5. Keep a log and evaluate your program.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Shelton Co. purchased a parcel of land six years ago for $877,500. At that time, the firm invested $149,000 in grading the site
    5·1 answer
  • Productivity is output multiplied by worker hours. <br><br> a. True <br><br> b. False
    11·1 answer
  • The demand curve of a monopolist is: A. downward sloping and above the marginal revenue curve. B. kinked because of recognized i
    13·2 answers
  • Establishing a 1%/10 Net 30 term would be considered a benefit to a favorite customer and should typically be offered after they
    8·1 answer
  • Which action is LEAST important to maintaining a healthy credit score?
    5·1 answer
  • As the price of jeans rises, Levi Strauss is likely to A. decrease production and thus decrease the supply. B. increase producti
    11·1 answer
  • A broker received a very high offer on a piece of property from a buyer. Bill makes a low offer through a "dummy" purchaser, or
    11·1 answer
  • Let's not do business with AVC Real Estate Company; they discount their commissions" is an example of what?a) Price fixingb) Boy
    8·1 answer
  • What are the eight differences between personal selling (direct contact) and non-personal selling (indirect contact, such as Int
    8·1 answer
  • When a shoe manufacturer decides to focus his attention on the segment of the market that is interested in running. this selecti
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!