1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kitty [74]
2 years ago
7

A car moving at 12 m/s applies its brakes and comes to a stop in 2 s. What was its acceleration?​

Chemistry
1 answer:
vredina [299]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h2>6 m/s²</h2>

Explanation:

The acceleration of an object given it's velocity and time taken can be found by using the formula

a =  \frac{v}{t}  \\

where

a is the acceleration

v is the velocity

t is the time

From the question we have

a =  \frac{12}{2}  \\

We have the final answer as

<h3>6 m/s²</h3>

Hope this helps you

You might be interested in
Macoy Inda
Andreyy89

Answer:

? the question isn't clear

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
20 points
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
The answer is Na+ Cl- and F+. Hope this helps!!!
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In general, the value of the equilibrium constant for a chemical reaction does NOT depend on_________.
mart [117]

Answer: Option (B) is the correct answer.

Explanation:

Equilibrium constant is defined as the relationship present between the amounts of products and reactants which are there at equilibrium in a reversible chemical reaction at a given temperature.

For example,     A + B \rightleftharpoons C + D

Mathematically,     K_{eq} = [C][D]

As the value of equilibrium constant depends on rate constants of the forward and reverse reactions. And, this rate of reaction also changes with change in pressure and temperature.

Therefore, it will also lead to change in equilibrium constant but it does not depend on initial amount pf reactants.

Thus, we can conclude that in general, the value of the equilibrium constant for a chemical reaction does NOT depend on the initial amounts of reactants present.

4 0
2 years ago
Scientists saw how well people responded to animals and imagined ___________ that these interactions might be helpful in some ty
sukhopar [10]

For most of the last 50 years, technology knew its place. We all spent a lot of time with technology—we drove to work, flew on airplanes, used telephones and computers, and cooked with microwaves. But even five years ago, technology seemed external, a servant. These days, what’s so striking is not only technology’s ubiquity but also its intimacy.

On the Internet, people create imaginary identities in virtual worlds and spend hours playing out parallel lives. Children bond with artificial pets that ask for their care and affection. A new generation contemplates a life of wearable computing, finding it natural to think of their eyeglasses as screen monitors, their bodies as elements of cyborg selves. Filmmakers reflect our anxieties about these developments, present and imminent. In Wim Wenders’s Until the End of the World, human beings become addicted to a technology that shows video images of their dreams. In The Matrix, the Wachowski brothers paint a future in which people are plugged into a virtual reality game. In Steven Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence, a woman struggles with her feelings for David, a robot child who has been programmed to love her.

Today, we are not yet faced with humanoid robots that demand our affection or with parallel universes as developed as the Matrix. Yet we’re increasingly preoccupied with the virtual realities we now experience. People in chat rooms blur the boundaries between their on-line and off-line lives, and there is every indication that the future will include robots that seem to express feelings and moods. What will it mean to people when their primary daily companion is a robotic dog? Or to a hospital patient when her health care attendant is built in the form of a robot nurse? Both as consumers and as businesspeople, we need to take a closer look at the psychological effects of the technologies we’re using today and of the innovations just around the corner.

Indeed, the smartest people in the field of technology are already doing just that. MIT and Cal Tech, providers of much of the intellectual capital for today’s high-tech business, have been turning to research that examines what technology does to us as well as what it does for us. To probe these questions further, HBR senior editor Diane L. Coutu met with Sherry Turkle, the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. Turkle is widely considered one of the most distinguished scholars in the area of how technology influences human identity.

Few people are as well qualified as Turkle to understand what happens when mind meets machine. Trained as a sociologist and psychologist, she has spent more than 20 years closely observing how people interact with and relate to computers and other high-tech products. The author of two groundbreaking books on people’s relationship to computers—The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit and Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet—Turkle is currently working on the third book, with the working title Intimate Machines, in what she calls her “computational trilogy.” At her home in Boston, she spoke with Coutu about the psychological dynamics between people and technology in an age when technology is increasingly redefining what it means to be human.

You’re at the frontier of research being done on computers and their effects on society. What has changed in the past few decades?

To be in computing in 1980, you had to be a computer scientist. But if you’re an architect now, you’re in computing. Physicians are in computing. Businesspeople are certainly in computing. In a way, we’re all in computing; that’s just inevitable. And this means that the power of the computer—with its gifts of simulation and visualization—to change our habits of thought extends across the culture.



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A block of ice is cooled from -0.5 degrees Celsius to -10.1 degrees Celsius. Calculate the temperature change, delta T, in degre
ss7ja [257]
Delta T= T final - T initial
Tfinal= -101.1 °C
Tinitial= -0.5 °C
•Delta T = -101.1°C - (-0.5°C)
=100.6°C

Kelvin= °C + 273
= -100.6 + 273
= 172.4 Kelvin
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A compound is 2.00% H by mass, 32.7% S by mass what is the empirical formula.
    15·1 answer
  • I need to clean the Kwik Switch thermometer between<br>each measurement.<br>O<br>True<br>False<br>​
    8·2 answers
  • A gas has a volume of 7.0 L and a mass of 8.50 X 109 grams. What is its density in g/ml?
    6·1 answer
  • What’s the oxidation number of k2so4
    7·1 answer
  • What is the product of barium + water​
    14·2 answers
  • A hot metal plate at 150°C has been placed in air at room temperature. Which event would most likely take place
    7·1 answer
  • What are the lengths of the diagonals of the kite?
    10·1 answer
  • The solubility of N2in blood at 37°C and at a partial pressure of 0.80 atm is 5.6 × 10−4mol/L. A deep-sea diver breathes compres
    8·1 answer
  • Use the equation to answer the question.
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!