Answer:
Explanation:
I think it's A.
You should always question the source. You might be lucky and discover what they've not said about their product. Or you may discover it is simply not true.
A few years back (many in fact), there was a product on the market call Laetrile. It was produced from peach pits. It has an overwhelming popularity that Sloan Kettering (the Cancer Clinic in New York -- the oldest and largest one in the world), spent some of their needed grant money to test Laetrile. The results -- nothing. Imagine what happened to those who marketed this product. Word got around. People with Cancer are pretty desperate. They and their loved ones will try anything.
But the facts on the internet help to dispel this kind of thing.
Answer:
Market Access
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the aspect that is being mentioned is known formally as Market Access. This term refers to the process of making sure that anyone who may benefit has fast and easy access to the brands that are being sold and at the correct price, and that there are no unfair restrictions being imposed.
Answer:
C. farmers would not be able to sell all their wheat.
Explanation:
At a price of $4, quantity supplied exceeds quantity demanded. Quantity supplied is 73 while quantity demanded is 50. There is an excess supply over demand. Therefore, farmers would not be able to sell all their wheat.
Equilibrium price is $2. This is where quantity supplied equals quantity demanded.
I hope my answer helps you
The expenditure incurred prior to the incorporation of an enterprise is to be considered as a pre-incorporation capital expenditure. The expenditure incurred prior to the 'setting-up of business' is to be considered as a pre-operative capital expenditure.
Answer: The correct answer is "relative perfomance".
Explanation: According to Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014), in winer-take-all markets, the compensation (e.g., revenues) is mainly determined by <u>relative perfomance.</u>
A type of market in which the winner takes everything clearly implies that the best competitors are those who take a large proportion of rewards while the worst little or nothing. To say that it is determined by their relative performance, refers to the subjects receiving rewards based on their performance in relation to the other competitors.
