Answer:
Algorithm for the above problem:
- Take a string from the user input.
- store the input string on any variable.
- Reverse the string and store it on the other variable.
- Compare both strings (character by character) using any loop.
- If all the character of the string matched then print that the "Input string is a palindrome".
- Otherwise, print "The inputted string is not a palindrome."
Output:
- If the user inputs "ababa", then it prints that the "Input string is palindrome"
- If the user inputs "ababaff", then it prints that the "Input string is not palindrome"
Explanation:
- The above-defined line is a set of an algorithm to check the number is palindrome or not.
- It is defined in English because the algorithm is a finite set of instructions written in any language used to solve the problem.
- The above algorithm takes input from the user, compare that string with its reverse and print palindrome, if the match is found.
Well the fact that jails are overcrowded is one factor that shows it's not working. Some people need help from past traumas, abuse, etc. Not everyone that acts out needs to be incarcerated, they need rehabilitation or counseling. Definitely depends on the crime committed. Therefore substance abuse users would be in rehabilitation. Even Juveniles in detention centers don't benefit from incarceration for certain offenses. There is no rehabilitation in incarceration. There are more criminals in jail and incarceration in my opinion, only for some offenders, is the last option. Now for Sex Offenders, Murderers and Criminals with violent crimes my opinion is completely opposite. Some of those offenders should be dealt with according to their crime. Also, all of the people that have been pardoned and them lessening time for drug traffickers and actual drug dealers (not necessarily users) is just a bad thing to pardon them or let them out because they don't have any violent crimes. Isn't dealing drugs, that are killing people every single day just as bad as a violent crime. In my opinion they can sit and rot for the longevity of their sentence. Some need help and I would fully support that only under some circumstances. Others I would rather not have to live amongst them.
Depending on what kind of security measures are implemented, D would definitely be a contender. However, B is also something to take into consideration. I would answer D.<span />
Answer:
I am pretty sure it's D. to teach strategy and critical thinking.
