Try socratic to answer that, it’s helped me
Answer:
George doesn't have enough money because the total cost of what he wants to buy costs $16.48 and he has $15. This means he needs an extra $1.48 to be able to buy what he needs
Step-by-step explanation:
From the above question:
George has $15. He tries to buy a movie ticket ($9.00), a pretzel ($2.65), a drink ($1.35), and two veggie cups ($1.74 each) but he does not have enough money.
Look at the numerical expression George used: 15 −( 9 + 2.65 + 1.35 + 2(1.74) )
Use the order of operations to simplify this expression.
Using the order of operations we have:
=$ 15 - (9 + 2.65 + 1.35 + 2(1.74) )
= $15 -( 9 + 2.65 + 1.35 + 3.48 )
=$ 15 - (16.48)
= $-1.48
George doesn't have enough money because the total cost of what he wants to buy costs $16.48 and he has $15. This means he needs an extra $1.48 to be able to buy what he needs
All the steps were correct except the final statement. The
mistake was in Line 6.
Line 6 triangle ABC is congruent to triangle EFD by
SAS.
<span>This does not follow. The SAS postulate states
that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle is congruent to two sides
and the included angle of another triangle. The student only proved that one side
of the triangle (AC) is congruent to the side of another triangle (EF) .</span>
