Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
Range = (237100, 292900)
Step-by-step explanation:
Using Chebyshevs Inequality:
Thus, 88.9% of the population is within 3 standard deviation of the mean with the Range = μ ± kσ
where;
μ = 265000
σ = 9300
Range = 265000 ± 3(9300)
Range = 265000 ± 27900
Range = (265000 - 27900, 265000 + 27900)
Range = (237100, 292900)
Answer:
The (prediction) for the number of times the spinner <u>wont</u> land on green is 14 times.
Step-by-step explanation:
First you need to find the possibility it will land on green. since there are 2 green spaces out of 9 possible spaces, there is a 2/9 chance you <u>will</u> get green from spinning. <u>This means there is a 7/9 chance you won't get green from spinning once.</u> By multiplying the fraction by the number of times you will spin, it is most likely you will get green 14 times out of 18 spins.
R=3 this is the answer...