Answer:
Federal District Court
Explanation:
The first case would likely start in the Federal District Court and could be appealed to the State Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. As seen in <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>the school district which suspended a girl for vulgar speech off school grounds started their case in the federal court of Middle District of Pennsylvania and eventually appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.
Edit: <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>did not appeal to the State Supreme Court likely because the First Amendment is a federal law and not state law.
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.
However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.
Answer:
b, determines guilt or innocence
Explanation:
On February 24, 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that students at school retain their First Amendment right to free speech. The story of this landmark case begins four years prior, during the early wave of protests against the Vietnam War.
The homeland security culture would strengthen, becoming more advanced then we have ever seen it
