<span>If the aqueous solution is 34% Licl then it is 100 - 34% water = 66%
From the calculation we've found out that it is 66% water. Then we need to find the weight from a 250 g solution.
66/100 * 250 = 165g
Hence it is 165g</span>
Mg + 1/2 O2 → MgO
1 mol = 24 g of Mg
X mol = 12 g of Mg
x = 0.5 moles of Mg
Mg :MgO = 1:1 (coefficient from equations using mole ratio)
So
0.5 moles of MgO
1 mol MgO = (24+16) g = 40 g
0.5 moles of MgO = 0.5 × 40
= 20 g of MgO produced
If we have 321 grams of a liquid, and the density is 0.84 g/mL, then we can easily find the volume of the liquid. We just need to take this 0.84 and multiply that by the number of grams. If we do 321 * 0.84, we get 269.64 mL. This is the volume that this liquid has.Remember this equation for future problems: V = D*M. V meaning volume, D meaning density, and M meaning mass. I hope this helps.
Addition of boiled, deionized water to the titrating flask to wash the wall of the erlenmeyer flask and the buret tip will have no effect on the Ksp value of ca(oh)2.
There will be no effect on the Ksp value as boiled deionised water is not able to alter the number of hydronium and hydroxide ions. As no change in the ions happen so there will be no change in Ksp value. The equilibrium constant for a solid material dissolving in an aqueous solution is the solubility product constant, Ksp. It stands for the degree of solute dissolution in solution. A substance's Ksp value increases with how soluble it is.
To know more about, solubility product constant, click here,
brainly.com/question/6960236
#SPJ4
Answer:
Your hypothesis is an educated guess of what the end results of an experiment will be, using what you already know about your experiment you are going to conduct. So when you receive your final results, if your hypothesis is correct, or even somewhat correct then you know that it is supported by your results. For example, if I were to conduct the Coca-Cola and Mentos experiment, I could make a hypothesis that the Coca-Cola will have a bigger eruption when I add more than one Mento to the bottle due to a higher amount of a chemical with the addition of each mento. When I receive my results that the eruption was bigger each time, I know that my results supported my hypothesis.
Explanation:
-Hope this helped
