Answer:
gram atomic mass
Explanation:
Mass of an atom expressed in grams is known as gram atomic mass. It is equal to the relative atomic mass or atomic weight in grams.
1109, 5.9 * 10 squared, -0.041, -4.2 times 10 to the -3, and -7.6 times 10 to the -5
Hope this helps
Answer: Sodium + water → hydrogen gas + sodium hydroxide (aq) + heat [(aq) means “dissolved in water”. It stands for “aqueous”.] If we boil off the water, we will be able to see the sodium hydroxide crystals. The sodium hydroxide is one of the two new substances produced by this chemical change.
Answer:
1.63 × 10²⁴ atoms.
Explanation:
To calculate the number of atoms (N) contained in 2.7moles of carbon, we multiply the number of moles (n) by Avogadro's number (6.02 × 10²³).
That is, N = n × nA
Where;
N = number of atoms
n = number of moles (mol)
nA = Avogadro's numbe
N = 2.7 × 6.02 × 10²³
N = 16.254 × 10²³
N = 1.63 × 10²⁴ atoms.
Hence, there are 1.63 × 10²⁴ atoms in 2.7moles of Carbon.
Answer:
D. The equipment needed to accommodate the high temperature and pressure will be expensive to produce.
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, for the considered reaction, it is clear it is an exothermic reaction because it produces energy; and therefore, the higher the temperature the more reactants are yielded as the reverse reaction is favored. Moreover, since the effect of pressure is verified as favoring the side with fewer moles; in this case the products side (2 moles of ammonia).
In such a way, the high pressure favors the formation of ammonia whereas the high temperature the formation of hydrogen and nitrogen and therefore, option A is ruled out. Since the high pressure shifts the reaction rightwards and the high temperature leftwards, we would not be able to know whether the reaction has ended or not because it will be a "go and come back" process, that is why B is also discarded. Now, since hydrogen and nitrogen would be the "wastes", we discard C because they are not toxic. That is why the most accurate answer would be D. because it is actually true that such equipment is quite expensive.
Best regards!