<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
Answer:
Let's see...
Step-by-step explanation:
*Note: we can't find the exact area of the shaded figure right off the bat, we have to find the area of a bigger figure and divide it by 2.
<h3>The coordinates of the bigger figure:</h3>
A = (0,0)
B' = (0,4)
C = (5,4)
D' = (5,0)
Note: the little [ ' ] next to the B and D indicate that it is not the same coordinate as B and D, just that those points would be the same as point B and D.
<h3>That being said, what is the area of the bigger figure?</h3>
A = l * w
A = 4 * 5
A = 20 units²
<h3>Now, divide the Area by 2:</h3>
A = 20 ÷ 2
<em>A = 10 units²</em>
I hope this helps!
- sincerelynini
Answer:
I do not agree because Mario's claim is not general.
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime numbers: These are a set of numbers that are divisible by 1 and itself only. Examples are: 2, 3, 5, 7. 11 etc.
And a denominator is the divisor in a given fraction.
Considering the following fractions whose denominators are prime numbers:
= 0.66666666...
= 0.142857142
= 0.45454545...
= 0.23076923
= 0.142857142
It could be observed that Mario's claim is not a general principle which is applicable to all fractions with a prime denominator. Thus, I do not agree with his claim.
Unlikely because certain would be 100% which is wrong
The minimum of this graph is the focus of the parabola. I'm not sure with the maximum though but I think it doesn't have a maximum because the y value of the parabola will extend infinitely upward.
