Answer: There are 1800 unique names from both the lists.
Explanation:
Since we have given that
there are two lists :
In First list, number of names = 1200
In Second list, number of names = 900
According to question , we have also given that
there are 150 names that appear on both lists,
So,
Number of unique names in the first list is given by
Number of unique names in the second list is given by
Therefore, total number of unique names is given by
Hence, there are 1800 unique names from both the lists.
Answer:
15w³
Step-by-step explanation:
you need to check for the of 225w^6 and see what you can take out.
you can take 3 w's out. and 225 is a perfect square, because 15² = 225
(basically the answer you have in there but you just have to get rid of square root)
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
<h3>How to estimate a definite integral by numerical methods</h3>
In this problem we must make use of Euler's method to estimate the upper bound of a <em>definite</em> integral. Euler's method is a <em>multi-step</em> method, related to Runge-Kutta methods, used to estimate <em>integral</em> values numerically. By integral theorems of calculus we know that definite integrals are defined as follows:
∫ f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a) (1)
The steps of Euler's method are summarized below:
- Define the function seen in the statement by the label f(x₀, y₀).
- Determine the different variables by the following formulas:
xₙ₊₁ = xₙ + (n + 1) · Δx (2)
yₙ₊₁ = yₙ + Δx · f(xₙ, yₙ) (3) - Find the integral.
The table for x, f(xₙ, yₙ) and y is shown in the image attached below. By direct subtraction we find that the <em>numerical</em> approximation of the <em>definite</em> integral is:
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648 - 0
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
To learn more on Euler's method: brainly.com/question/16807646
#SPJ1
Answer:
2.5 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
24 + 20 = 44
110 divided by 44 = 2.5
If you divide by 8, you can put the equation into intercept form. That form is ...
... x/a + y/b = 1
where <em>a</em> and <em>b</em> are the x- and y-intercepts, respectively.
Here, your equation would be
... x/(-2) + y/(-4) = 0
The graph with those intercepts is not shown with your problem statement here. See the attachment for the graph.
