This is the answer to 67,473 divided by 32. I hoped this helped. I used colors to hopefully help you more.
3-2|x+4|+3=1 the answer for this
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Please check the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) How much will you have at the middle of the first year?
Principle P = $300
Annual rate r = 6% = 0.06 per year
Compound n = Semi-Annually = 2
Time (t in years) = 0.5 years
Total amount = A = ?
Using the formula
substituting the values
$
Therefore, the total amount accrued, principal plus interest, from compound interest on an original principal of $ 300.00 at a rate of 6% per year compounded 2 times per year over 0.5 years is $ 309.00.
Part b) How much at the end of one year?
Principle P = $300
Annual rate r = 6% = 0.06 per year
Compound n = Semi-Annually = 2
Time (t in years) = 1 years
Total amount = A = ?
Using the formula
so substituting the values
$
Therefore, the total amount accrued, principal plus interest, from compound interest on an original principal of $ 300.00 at a rate of 6% per year compounded 2 times per year over 1 year is $ 318.27.
6. When we multiply two surdic integers, we can leave it into one big surd.
For instance, if we have:
, we can simplify it down to one uniform square root sign, 
.
So, we can say:
, which is a rational root, because the square root of 36 can be converted into an integer, namely 6 and -6.
Hence, it is a rational root.
7. The summation, on the other hand, cannot be simplified any further, so it will stay as irrational. This is because √2 is already an irrational root, and adding it onto a number that is rational will stay as irrational.
8. Once again, the summation cannot be simplified. We can only simplify by factoring like terms. Hence, this must be irrational.
9. Even if it is in fractional notation, √5 can never be a rational number because no two integers when multiplied by itself will give 5. So, even if it is written in fractional form, they cannot be rational if there is an already irrational term in it.
For instance, if we have:
So, we can say:
Hence, it is a rational root.
7. The summation, on the other hand, cannot be simplified any further, so it will stay as irrational. This is because √2 is already an irrational root, and adding it onto a number that is rational will stay as irrational.
8. Once again, the summation cannot be simplified. We can only simplify by factoring like terms. Hence, this must be irrational.
9. Even if it is in fractional notation, √5 can never be a rational number because no two integers when multiplied by itself will give 5. So, even if it is written in fractional form, they cannot be rational if there is an already irrational term in it.