When Rome declined, the western half of the empire formed the Byzantine Empire. The eastern half became the Holy Roman Empire. Because the Byzantine Empire came from the fall of the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire had many similarities with Rome. In addition to these similarities, there were also several differences between these two empires. This includes culture, religion, and location. These similarities and differences helped shape the Byzantine Empire into what it became. One similarity between these two Empires was the form of entertainment that took place in these cultures. Both the Byzantine Empire and the Roman Empire enjoyed watching gladiator fights at a big stadium. (Rautman) The people of the Roman Empire held these events at the Coliseum. In the Byzantine Empire, there was the Circus Maximus, another stadium. The use of this arena was the same as the Coliseum in Rome. Gladiator fights and chariot races were held here. It is estimated that 50,000 to 350,000 people, or approximately a quarter of the population of the city could fit inside. It has also been calculated that the arena of the Coliseum would fit 12 times into the Circus Maximus. (Crowther) A difference between the Byzantine and Roman Empire was their form of religion. (Salisbury)In Rome the people worshipped Jupiter as the father of all gods. Jupiter and his wife Juno had many children that were also gods. For example, Mars, the god of war was a child of Jupiter. Mercury, the messenger god was another son of Jupiter and his wife. This meant that Rome was a polytheistic society. They believed in more than one god. The Byzantine Empire, on the other hand, was a monotheistic society. This meant that they believed in only one god. They mainly followed the teachings of Christianity. (Ermatinger) In conclusion, the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire were unique in their own was. Both civilizations rose out of fallen cultures. While the Roman Empire rose from the Roman Republic, the Byzantine Empire was established because of the fall of the Roman Empire. Despite these differences, the two cultures had similar aspects in culture, geography, science and technology. Some of these included government, religion, and location. These characteristics helped develop the two great civilizations and influence the world today.
Normally, that would be described as fad dieting looking for a quick fix to problems. I found a similar question with some choices. Out of those, this describes fanaticism; Being overly concerned with something to the point where you will try anything to get rid of it. This is increased as popular celebs promote it, even if others advise against it.
It is indeed a sort of injection wherein the code being compelled to execute instead of any other program coding.
Such "injected" programming code is typically programming created to execute harmful tasks by a third-party programmer or operator, regarding reverse engineering assaults, mainly DLL injections attacks have been performed.
If Ken does not account for variables such as age that could also influence one's ability to recall these events, age could be considered a "confounding variable". A confounding variable is an outside impact that progressions the impact of a dependent and independent variable. This incidental impact is utilized to impact the result of a experimental plan. Basically, a confounding variable is an additional variable went into the condition that was not represented. confounding variables can demolish an examination and deliver futile outcomes. They propose that there are connections when there truly are definitely not.
Planfulness: Specially pattern of thought can change them and increase the likelihood of the achievement of the goal such as generating heuristics automate the goal-oriented present attention movement, goal-related decision making to the future to make increase the salience of a distal goal and contrasted the enjoyment related goals and progress required to complete it. It will unknown if there would be stable differences intendancy to deploy particular meta-cognition during goal pursuits. A tool to assess such differences would help to identify and intervene on a personal barrier to goal assess. Planfulness that capture the person proclivity to adapt efficient goal-related recognition in pursuits their goal.
