Answer:
b I believe I just take it
Answer:
Multiplying and dividing fractions are essentially the same process which you multiply the numbers straight across and no need for common denominators. Except in division of fractions, the second fraction is flipped so that the denominator is on the top and the numerator is on the bottom (reciprocal).
Step-by-step explanation:
Example:
![\frac{3}{4} * \frac{1}{5} = \frac{3}{20}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B20%7D)
÷ ![\frac{1}{5} = \frac{3}{4} * \frac{5}{1} = \frac{15}{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B1%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B15%7D%7B4%7D)
Answer: Choice B) experimental probability is larger
-----------------------------------------------------------------
There are 3 odd numbers (1,3,5) out of 6 total (1,2,3,4,5,6) on the number cube. So theoretically, the chances of rolling an odd number are 3/6 = 1/2 = 0.5
When we do the experiment, we roll an odd number 325 times out of 500 trials total. So the experimental probability is 325/500 = 0.65
Comparing the results of 0.5 and 0.65, we see that 0.65 is larger. So the experimental probability is larger.
Note: with a large number of trials, the experimental probability should get closer and closer to the theoretical probability. This is assuming that all trials are independent of one another and the number cube is properly weighted.
<h2>C is the correct answer</h2><h2></h2><h3>The amount of money <u>depends</u> on how many lawns he mows.</h3><h3></h3><h3><em>Please let me know if I am wrong.</em></h3>