A particle smaller than an atom or a <span>cluster of such particles </span>
Answer:
The weights are 1 kg, 3kg, 9kg and 27kg.
Explanation:
The weights are 1 kg, 3kg, 9kg and 27kg.
1+3+9+27= 40
27+9+3= 39
27+9+3-1=38
27+9+1=37
27+9=36
27+9-1=35
27+9+1-3=34
27+9-3=33
27+9-3-1=32
27+3+1=31
27+3=30
27+3-1=29
27+1=28
27
27-1=26
27+1-3=25
27-3=24
27-3-1=23
27+3+1-9=22
27+3-9=21
27+3-9-1=20
Like this all the weights from 1 to 40 kg can be made using 1,3,9 and 27 kg.
Answer:
reduced
Explanation:
The use of bearing surfaces that are themselves sacrificial, such as low shear materials, of which lead/copper journal bearings are an example
So the answer is B. because the mass have Kg as a international unit and velocity is m/s, they are international units in physics.
There's no such thing as "an unbalanced force".
If all of the forces acting on an object all add up to zero, then we say that
<span>the group </span>of forces is balanced. When that happens, the group of forces
has the same effect on the object as if there were no forces on it at all.
An example:
Two people with exactly equal strength are having a tug-of-war. They pull
with equal force in opposite directions. Each person is sweating and straining,
grunting and groaning, and exerting tremendous force. But their forces add up
to zero, and the rope goes nowhere. The <u>group</u> of forces on the rope is balanced.
On the other hand, if one of the offensive linemen is pulling on one end of
the rope, and one of the cheerleaders is pulling on the other end, then their
forces don't add up to zero, because even though they're opposite, they're
not equal. The <u>group</u> of forces is <u>unbalanced</u>, and the rope moves.
A group of forces is either balanced or unbalanced. A single force isn't.
