SheeeeeeeshI MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE
⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RI MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE RAGE⁉️I MISS THE R
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Function <u>#2</u> has a greater minimum.
#3 < #1 < #2
Step-by-step explanation:
In the picture attached, the question is shown.
The minimum of Function #1 is located at (3, -1). This is seen in the picture.
The minimum of Function #2 is located at (1.5, 1). We can see in the table that the function is symmetric respect 1.5 (half-point between 1 and 2).
The function y = x² + 3x - 4 has its minimum at its vertex:
x-coordinate of vertex: x = -b/(2a) = -3/(2*1) = -1.5
y-coordinate of vertex: y = (-1.5)² + 3(-1.5) - 4 = -6.25
So, the minimum of Function #3 is located at (-1.5, -6.25)
