<span>Answer: a) Greater than or equal to 38 feet
b)Since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for the length of the deck.
Explanation: Given that the width of the deck is 29 ft.
and the perimeter of the deck is at least 134 ft.
134 = 2(length + width)
134 = (2 x length) + (2 x 29)
134 = (2 x length) + 58
2 x length = 134 - 58
2 x length = 76
length = 76 / 2
length = 38 ft
Thus, the inequality will be:
a)Length ≥ 38 ft
b)since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for length of deck.</span>
Answer: No, The goal when testing a hypothesis is to to guess a large significant level to possibly have the answer correct based upon evidence. False. It needs to be a large significant level
Step-by-step explanation:
Rounded to the tenth: 3.3
Square roots that are not perfect squares are always
irrational
Yes it is a function, it passes the straight line test
Answer:
Your answer to this would be 114.44
It was 114.435, but I round it.
