Answer:
v = 7.69 x 10³ m/s = 7690 m/s
T = 5500 s = 91.67 min = 1.53 h
Explanation:
In order for the satellite to orbit the earth, the force of gravitation on satellite must be equal to the centripetal force acting on it:

where,
G = Universal Gravitational Constant = 6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ N.m²/kg²
Me = Mass of Earth = 5.97 x 10²⁴ kg
r = distance between the center of Earth and Satellite = Radius of Earth + Altitude = 6.371 x 10⁶ m + 0.361 x 10⁶ m = 6.732 x 10⁶ m
v = orbital speed = ?
Therefore,

<u>v = 7.69 x 10³ m/s</u>
For time period satellite completes one revolution around the earth. It means that the distance covered by satellite is equal to circumference of circle at the given altitude.
So, its orbital speed can be given as:

where,
T = Time Period of Satellite = ?
Therefore,

<u>T = 5500 s = 91.67 min = 1.53 h</u>
Answer:
a) 4.04*10^-12m
b) 0.0209nm
c) 0.253MeV
Explanation:
The formula for Compton's scattering is given by:

where h is the Planck's constant, m is the mass of the electron and c is the speed of light.
a) by replacing in the formula you obtain the Compton shift:

b) The change in photon energy is given by:

c) The electron Compton wavelength is 2.43 × 10-12 m. Hence you can use the Broglie's relation to compute the momentum of the electron and then the kinetic energy.


Smaller cars have less momentum than bigger cars. What’s in motion stays in motion but objects with more momentum (can be from weight or from speed but in this case it’s about weight) tend to stay in motion longer.
The answer is: "
44
km " ;
or; write as: "
44.333 km " .
___________________________________________________________Explanation:___________________________________________________________(70 km + 63 km) ÷ (2 + 1 ) = 133 km ÷ 3 = "
44
km " ;
or; write as: "
44.333 km " .
___________________________________________________________
Adaptation will mean taking action to minimize the negative effects of change. ... the use of new tools and techniques for decision-making, For example, projected increases in drought, fire, windstorms, and insect and disease outbreaks are expected to result in greater tree mortality. Fewer trees will reduce Canada’s timber supply, which in turn will affect the economic competitiveness of Canada’s forest industry. This would leave forestry-dependent communities vulnerable to job losses, closure of forestry processing facilities and an overall economic slump.