Answer:
Shared assumptions.
Explanation:
As per the question, <u>'shared assumptions'</u> <u>are demonstrated as the 'unconscious and presupposed perceptions or the prefect prototypes of the behavior that are regarded as the appropriate way to think about a particular problem or opportunity or act in such situations</u>.' These are the basis of any organizational culture as they form the common base of perceptions, behaviors, or beliefs that are shared by almost every member part of the culture. These beliefs or assumptions are so deeply embedded that they have been taken-for-granted and remain unnoticed despite being an inherent part of the culture.
D. is right as in the begginig is stated that there is water available and the soil is fertile with basically means natural resorces (the 2 most important at least). And there is few captal invested (few interpreneurs interested then) and not enough info to say that there is human resourses (but we can infer that there aren't as it's not a well developed economical sector in the country. So only D is right. Hope it helped. Toodles
This is a <u>True statement</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Acheulean is a tool made up of stone. The tool appears in distinctive oval and pear-shape. It is commonly used as <u>"hand-axes"</u> in olden days.
Acheulean hand ax is made by the ancestors of hominin family. It is used as a tool for scavenging and cutting. The axes are flaked to make it sharp at the edges. This tool was also used in cutting plants, digging the soil and butchering purposes.
Archaeological department suggests that the ax was in use between earlier hominins and H. erectus.
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
