1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
3 years ago
12

An equation is shown: a×b=c. Let c be an irrational number. What can be said about a and b?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Sati [7]3 years ago
7 0

if c is a irrational number that means a or b is also an irrational number or both of them are irrational numbers but they are different then each other

i hope that will help

yanalaym [24]3 years ago
5 0

There are two possible answers:

  • 'a' is irrational and b is rational, OR
  • 'a' is rational and b is irrational

You can only pick one of those two cases. In short, exactly one of the 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational. Both 'a' and b cannot be rational together, and they both cannot be irrational together.

================================================

Explanation:

For a moment, let's say that 'a' and b are both rational numbers. This means they would be ratios of integers. So,

a = p/q

b = r/s

where p,q,r,s are integers. The denominators q & s cannot be zero.

Multiplying those rational numbers 'a' and b leads to

a*b = (p/q)*(r/s) = (p*r)/(q*s)

We get a result in the form of integer/integer. Recall that multiplying any two integers leads to some other integer. Since (p*r)/(q*s) is a ratio of integers, it is rational and that makes a*b = c to be rational. However, your teacher said that c is irrational which is the opposite of rational.

In short, if both 'a' and b are rational, then a*b = c is rational. This means we know for certain that both 'a' and b cannot be both rational for c to be irrational.

------------------------

Next, we'll consider 'a' and b to both be irrational. Is it possible to have a*b = c to be irrational as well? It depends.

If we have the following

a = sqrt(3)

b = sqrt(12)

then,

a*b = sqrt(3)*sqrt(12) = sqrt(3*12) = sqrt(36) = 6

Showing that a*b is rational because 6 = 6/1 is a ratio of integers. This is a bit strange considering how 'a' and b themselves were irrational, but they led to a rational product.

This doesn't always happen since something like

sqrt(3)*sqrt(5) = sqrt(3*5) = sqrt(15)

is irrational. So if both 'a' and b are irrational together, then a*b could be rational or it could be irrational. We would need more information about the values of 'a' and b.

Therefore, we know that we can rule out the case that 'a' and b are irrational together.

------------------------

Lastly, we'll consider the case when one of 'a' or b is rational while the other is irrational. The order doesn't matter. So we'll make 'a' to be irrational and b to be rational.

Since b is rational, this means b = p/q for some integers p,q where q is nonzero. The value of 'a' cannot be written as a ratio like this because it is irrational.

Multiplying any nonzero rational number with an irrational one always leads to an irrational result. If a*b was rational, then we could say

a*b = r/s

a*(p/q) = r/s

a = (r/s)*(q/p)

a = (r*q)/(s*p)

Showing that 'a' is rational, but this contradicts the fact we made 'a' to be irrational at the top of this section. Therefore, a*b is always irrational if exactly one of 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational.

In other words, if,

  • 'a' is rational and b is irrational, or
  • 'a' is irrational and b is rational

then a*b = c is irrational

You might be interested in
Determine the x and y intercepts
kakasveta [241]
Answer:
x-intercepts: (2,0), (4,0)
y-intercepts: (0,-8)

Explanation:
To find the x intercept(s), you must compute where y=0. So solve 0= -x^2 + 6x - 8. So, the x intercepts are: (2,0) and (4,0) since the solutions to the mentioned equation are x=2 and x=4. To find the y intercept(s) compute what is y when x=0. In this case, when x=0, y=-8. So the only y intercept is (0,-8).
5 0
3 years ago
Write and evaluate the expression. Then, complete the statements. Ten less than the quotient of thirty and a number Evaluate whe
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

expression:  (30/t) - 10

evaluation:  30/2 - 10 = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which expression is equivalent to 21 × 7?
belka [17]

I wanna say the answer is A

6 0
3 years ago
It took 30 minutes for Melinda to run 4 miles<br> (Find the unit rate and explain what they mean)
zhannawk [14.2K]
Each mile took 7.5 minutes. So we did this by dividing 30 by 4. Hope this helped you :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If in drawing your vector you are required to use a scale such that 25 grams represent 1 cm, and if your resultant vector measur
Aleks04 [339]

If we multiply the ratio

... 25 g : 1 cm

by 5, we get

... 125 g : 5 cm

The number on the left is 75 g more than 50 g.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is number 3 please explain for brainlest answer !! :))
    10·1 answer
  • What is the inverse of the function f(x) =1/9x + 2?
    5·1 answer
  • 8 + 3^2 X 5+ 2 X (3+7)​
    14·1 answer
  • How do you find the leg of a triangle?
    14·1 answer
  • A phone company charges $0.50 per minute and a connection fee of $1. If you were to represent the total cost y of an x minute ca
    10·1 answer
  • What value of x makes this equation true <br> x/3 - 3 = x/9 + 3
    11·2 answers
  • Why is the product of 1 and 3/4 equal to 3/4?
    12·1 answer
  • So i'm really confused how do you get 3 5/12 in this question? Manson bought 8 1/4 feet of wire. He cut off a piece of wire 3 5/
    13·1 answer
  • What is the nth term of this sequence?
    11·1 answer
  • Find cos 0, where 0 is the angle shown.<br> Give an exact value, not a decimal approximation.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!