The Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War consists of the major military operations west of the Mississippi River. The area is often thought of as excluding the states and territories bordering the Pacific Ocean, which formed the Pacific Coast Theater of the American Civil War (1861–1865).
Map of Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War, featuring only the major battles
The campaign classification established by the National Park Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior[1] is more fine-grained than the one used in this article. Some minor NPS campaigns have been omitted and some have been combined into larger categories. Only a few of the 75 major battles the NPS classifies for this theater are described. Boxed text in the right margin show the NPS campaigns associated with each section.
Activity in this theater in 1861 was dominated largely by the dispute over the status of the border state of Missouri. The Missouri State Guard, allied with the Confederacy, won important victories at the Battle of Wilson's Creek and the First Battle of Lexington. However, they were driven back at the First Battle of Springfield. A Union army under Samuel Ryan Curtis defeated the Confederate forces at the Battle of Pea Ridge in northwest Arkansas in March 1862, solidifying Union control over most of Missouri. The areas of Missouri, Kansas, and the Indian Territory (modern-day Oklahoma) were marked by extensive guerrilla activity throughout the rest of the war, the most well-known incident being the infamous Lawrence massacre in the Unionist town of Lawrence, Kansas of August 1863.
hope It Helps U
Please Mark as Brainliest
The answer is "reinforcement".
The behavior comes into contact with contingencies of reinforcement after the model evokes an imitation. The controlling variable for discriminated operant is the new contingencies of reinforcement. This situation explains Controlled Relation, which is considered as the most important property that defines imitation between a model and a similar behavior.
The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
<span>B. Fidelity and Responsibility would be most appropriate answer here.
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
The multinational corporation in the Philippines are doing well and sometime more good than the other Asian countries.
Explanation:
Philippines is a country in the southeast Asia. It is a developing country. Lately, many of the foreign companies and multinational corporations are investing in Philippines and it extremely boosting the economy of Philippines.
Many multinational companies are being set up in Philippines and it is helping Philippines to rise its economy. The employment rate of Philippines is also increasing as new companies are establishing in Philippines and bring out new job opportunities in the country.
This has also lead to better management skills of the people of Philippines as the people are trained to work in the corporate.
Their GDP is also increasing. Thus Philippines is performing far better than their other neighboring countries in the South east Asia.
