1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
4 years ago
6

15}{3} " align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">
​
Mathematics
2 answers:
yuradex [85]4 years ago
8 0
Reduces to -5 ..........
Butoxors [25]4 years ago
8 0
The answer is -5. almost like saying 3/15 then putting the negative in the front
You might be interested in
Which expression is equivalent to -2.8x-6.3
wariber [46]

Answer:

-0.7(4x+9)

Step-by-step explanation:

-2.8x-6.3=-0.7(4x+9)

4 0
4 years ago
If (6y − 11)(6y 11) = ay^2 − b, what is the value of a? the value of a is ____________.
Triss [41]
(6y - 11)(6y + 11) = ay² - b    |use (a - b)(a + b) = a² - b²

(6y)² - 11² =ay² - b

36y² - 121 = ay² - b    |add b to both sides

ay² = 36y² - 121 + b        |divide both sides by y² ≠ 0

a = (36y² - 121 + b)/y²

\boxed{a=\dfrac{36y^2-121+b}{y^2}}
7 0
3 years ago
100 points! Please help asap! Look at the picture attached. My teacher said that both 1 and 2 are neither can someone explain wh
Neko [114]

Answer:

Your teacher is right, there is not enough info

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>Question 1</h3>

We can see that RS is divided by half

The PQ is not indicated as perpendicular to RS or RQ is not indicates same as QS

So P is not on the perpendicular bisector of RS

<h3>Question 2</h3>

We can see that PD⊥DE and PF⊥FE

There is no indication that PD = PF or ∠DEP ≅ FEP

So PE is not the angle bisector of ∠DEF

6 0
3 years ago
Ten points to the correct answer
ale4655 [162]
This should be the correct answer.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You have $33. You want to buy a necklace and one other item from the list. a. Write an inequality to represent the situation. Le
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The inequality for amount x (in dollars) is given by

 x ≤ $33 - (cost of necklace).

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the cost of the necklace be $ y.

The amount for the necklace is constant and it is less than $33 and it is also known that the amount for the necklace will be spent.

Therefore after the necklace has been purchased and the amount deducted from $33 the remaining amount can be used completely or partly to purchase the other item.

Let  the cost in dollars of the other item be $x.

The inequality for amount x (in dollars) is given by

 x ≤ $33 - (cost of necklace)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the volume? Please answer asap.
    12·1 answer
  • Which is the standard form of the equation of the parabola that has a vertex of (3, 1) and a directric of x = -2?
    14·2 answers
  • Evaluate the expression. P(9, 3) · P(5, 4)
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me with this !
    8·2 answers
  • Please help, thanks.
    11·2 answers
  • Dylan opened a credit card account with $750.00 of available credit. Now that he has made some purchases, Dylan's account only h
    6·1 answer
  • I need help people please help me
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the expressions below has a 6 in the hundredths place of the product? Select all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • 6.
    12·1 answer
  • Find the area of the figure. Use 3.14 for π.<br> The area of the figure is about __m2.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!