1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
3 years ago
13

The traditional economic framework assumes that people make rational economic decisions, that is, that they act in ways that max

imize their utilities. However, behavioral economists have found evidence that is inconsistent with economists’ rationality assumptions. Which of the following is an example of evidence of irrational behavior? (Note: Read carefully.) Some wine collectors decide not to sell their 20-year-old bottle of wine at the market price while refusing to buy another one at the same price. Some people are willing to drive an extra mile to save $20 on a $100 purchase but not to save $10 on the same purchase. A higher price generally decreases the quantity demanded of a commodity.
Business
1 answer:
iragen [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Some wine collectors decide not to sell their 20-year-old bottle of wine at the market price while refusing to buy another one at the same price.

Explanation:

If the wine collectors do not want to sell at the market price, this usually means that they place a higher value on their wine than the market is offering for it. This is rational and might hold water if they know something the market does not.

It is irrational however if they are offered a similar wine at the marker price and they do not buy it. A rationally minded person would have purchased the wine at the market price so that they can now have two wines that are valued above the market thereby presenting a chance to make profit.

You might be interested in
President of the United States promises to produce more defense goods without any decreases in the production of other goods. Th
anastassius [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is option b.

Explanation:

A production possibilities frontier shows the maximum possible bundles of two goods that an economy can produce using its given resources and level of technology.  

Because of the scarcity of resources, the production of a good can be increased only by decreasing the production of the other good.  

It is possible to increase the production of a good without reducing the production of the other only if the economy is producing at a point below the production possibilities curve.

8 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is true of budgeting? Question 1 options: Budgeting forces management to plan for the future. Budgeting c
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

correct option is Budgeting forces management to plan for the future.

Explanation:

The budget depends on the control cycle to design the planning cycle for future action. Because budget is the only way to compare reality in determining performance evaluation, but budget is not in the nose of planning the future                                                          

so correct option is Budgeting forces management to plan for the future.

3 0
4 years ago
An investment that you bought for ____
scoray [572]
The answer is C and cannot be no other one because you bought it less that what you sold it for
6 0
3 years ago
The Route 66 Gift Shop, which records sales and sales tax separately, had sales on account of $1,500 and cash sales of $1,000. T
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: D. Debit to Accounts Receivable of $1,620 and a debit to Cash of $1,080.

Explanation:

Route 66 Gift Shop records sales and sales tax separately so we would have to account for both of them in the amount recorded in the Journal Entry.

For the Accounts Receivables therefore the figure we would record is,

= 1,500 + 1500(0.08)

= $1,620

For the Cash Sales would be

= 1,000 + 1000(0.08)

= $1,080

Therefore option D is correct.

5 0
3 years ago
The following data are for the Akron Division of Consolidated Rubber, Inc.: Sales $ 800,000 Net operating income $ 50,000 Averag
ELEN [110]

Answer:

ROI 87.5%

Explanation:

Return on Investment = return /investment

Total return

50,000 perating income + 20,000 residual income = 70,000 income

The asset could been adquire on lease or through liabilities, this is not investment. The investmetn made is the one done by the shareholders.

Stock Holders equity = investment = 80,000

The shareholders invest this amount to generate

70,000 dollars of return

ROI  70,000/80,000 = 87.5%

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The comparative balance sheet of Merrick Equipment Co. for December 31, 20Y9 and 20Y8, is as follows:
    9·1 answer
  • Select the examples that best represent Architecture and Construction customers. Check all that apply. a supermarket company tha
    7·2 answers
  • If Gary always requests his superior’s advice when solving a problem or making a decision, which type of decision maker is he?
    14·1 answer
  • Mackenzie is spending weeks in deciding which pair of jeans to buy because she is considering all the factors involved, such as
    12·2 answers
  • Rob Bill Berries 20 30 Fish 80 60 Rob Crusoe and Bill Friday spent their week-long vacation on a desert Island where they had to
    11·1 answer
  • At an output level of 415,400 units, you have calculated that the degree of operating leverage is 2.00. The operating cash flow
    9·1 answer
  • From your personal experience, what makes you decide whether or not to follow a specific influencer? If you don't use social med
    6·1 answer
  • Multiple Choice Questions _which level of management is responsible for establishing a vision for the organization, developing b
    13·2 answers
  • Managers make assumptions in CVP analysis. These assumptions include:__________
    15·1 answer
  • The exchange gain or loss on repatriated funds from a foreign branch is calculated by multiplying the nominal amount of the fund
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!