Answer:
The correct option here is B)
Explanation:
The non compete clause is an agreement between an employer and employee ( as it is in this question between Roger and HR consulting firm ) , where an employee agree to the wishes of employer to not to work for firms which are competing against the employer in the same market.
E marketplace can take two different formats, which are Independent trading communities and private exchange.
Usually, the transaction in independent trading communities will be easily visible by others while private exchange tend to be more secretive
hope this helps
The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
It is A. So that I know whether I have identified potential barriers
Answer:
B) Climate of trust
Explanation:
The problem seems to be Climate of trust. This fundamental factor allows teams to perform better than the sum of the performance of each of its members. Through an environment of trust, each member is supported and coached by other team members making individual improvements and increasing synergies within the team. A climate of trust is not exempt from criticism, but this criticism is understood as a helping tool rather than an instrument of personal harm. Finally, a climate of trust allows that errors and mistakes become a useful source of learning.
