1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
miskamm [114]
3 years ago
6

Prepare a table comparing the coins of malla period to the present time and present it to the time​

Social Studies
1 answer:
kolezko [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Excavations in Tilaurkot during the period of 1967-1976, revealed that the earliest coins recorded in Nepal are ‘kushan’, ‘kaniksha’ and ‘havisha’ coins (1st century) and the ‘punch marked’ coins (6th and 5th century B.C.). King Mandeva’s rule in the 5th century gave birth to the Licchavi coins. It was during the Malla period that more systemization was brought in monetary terms. Coins were then issued in denominations of 2 mohur (equivalent to one rupee), 1 mohur (50 paisa), one and a half sukka (36 paisa), sukka (25 paisa), sukki, or ‘tinnani’, (12 paisa), anni (6 paisa), adhani (3 paisa), paisa (1 paisa), and dam (1/4 paisa).

Explanation:

do u want the timeline of it

i do hav that

You might be interested in
Which of the following cases would the U.S. Supreme Court be the first to hear?
Ket [755]

Answer:

Option C, a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court structure of the United States. The procedures of the Supreme Court takes place following the constitution of the United States along with various federal laws and the internal regulations of the court. The court has the appellate authority over all the federal as well as the state courts that incorporates a constitutional law.

Though the Supreme Court hears appeals from the lower courts it is all up to the Supreme Court that which case to be heard first.

Therefore, in the given options C will be the first case to be heard by the Supreme Court. The main reason for this is that all the other cases can be appealed in the lower or state court while this one "a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador" is the case between two nations.

3 0
3 years ago
What educatino do you need to be a wildlife veterinarian?
Andreyy89
First you should study in <span>veterinary school afterwards studying in </span>zoological medicine would be best
3 0
3 years ago
Who were the conquered people that lived in rome
Solnce55 [7]
Well Rome conquered many countries and people but the first ones were probably the Carthaginians. It could also be the Jewish, Germanic tribes, Celtics, etc.
6 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS ALL MY QUESTIONS!!!!
defon

1. The conflict began after Athens and Eretria gave assistance to the Ionians in their rebellion against Persia and its ruler, Darius.

3 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Clarice is a 5-year-old who is watching a movie and eating popcorn with her 3-year-old brother. Clarice’s brother finishes his p
    10·1 answer
  • What mineral lies under most of the North Central Plains and the Great Plains?
    7·1 answer
  • Another name for a farmer could be
    14·2 answers
  • _______ is a system of farming where lots up to a half mile or more extend back from a river
    15·1 answer
  • I need help on this question you don't have to do the( explain how the two interact)if you want to
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of a breaching experiment? a. Walking into an elevator and turning to face the door.
    10·1 answer
  • Complete the table to summarize how linkage institutions influence public policy or public opinion
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these BEST describes why Georgia was important to United States during World War I?
    13·2 answers
  • The purpose of the general council was to _____________________.
    8·2 answers
  • Identify the correct statements about the life of ayuba diallo.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!