1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frosja888 [35]
3 years ago
9

The international space station travels at a distance of about 250 miles above Earth’s surface and at a speed of 17,500 miles pe

r hour. Even though space dust and debris can be tiny, 1 centimeter or less in size with a mass of 10 grams or less, there is always fear that the space station will sustain damage from a collision with a small piece of space debris.
Why should scientists be concerned about a collision with such a tiny object? Use evidence and scientific reasoning to explain your answer.
Chemistry
1 answer:
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
5 0

On a daily basis, about one hundred tons of interplanetary material drifts down to the Earth’s surface. Most of the smallest interplanetary particles that reach the Earth’s surface are the tiny dust particles that are released by comets as their ices vaporize in the solar neighborhood. The vast majority of the larger interplanetary material that reaches the Earth’s surface originates as the collision fragments of asteroids that have run into one another some eons ago.

Asteroids Threaten Earth

With an average interval of about 10,000 years, rocky or iron asteroids larger than about 100 meters would be expected to reach the Earth’s surface and cause local disasters or produce the tidal waves that can inundate low lying coastal areas. On an average of every several hundred thousand years or so, asteroids larger than a kilometer could cause global disasters. In this case, the impact debris would spread throughout the Earth’s atmosphere so that plant life would suffer from acid rain, partial blocking of sunlight, and from the firestorms resulting from heated impact debris raining back down upon the Earth’s surface. Since their orbital paths often cross that of the Earth, collisions with near-Earth objects have occurred in the past and we should remain alert to the possibility of future close Earth approaches. It seems prudent to mount efforts to discover and study these objects, to characterize their sizes, compositions and structures and to keep an eye upon their future trajectories.

Because of the ongoing search efforts to find nearly all the large NEOs, objects will occasionally be found to be on very close Earth approaching trajectories. Great care must then be taken to verify any Earth collision predictions that are made. Given the extremely unlikely nature of such a collision, almost all of these predictions will turn out to be false alarms. However, if an object is verified to be on an Earth colliding trajectory, it seems likely that this collision possibility will be known several years prior to the actual event. Given several years warning time, existing technology could be used to deflect the threatening object away from Earth. The key point in this mitigation process is to find the threatening object years ahead of time so that an orderly international campaign can be mounted to send spacecraft to the threatening object. One of the techniques suggested for deflecting an asteroid includes nuclear fusion weapons set off above the surface to slightly change the asteroid’s velocity without fracturing it. High speed neutrons from the explosion would irradiate a shell of material on the surface of the asteroid facing the explosion. The material in this surface shell would then expand and blow off, thus producing a recoil upon the asteroid itself. A very modest velocity change in the asteroid’s motion (only a few millimeters per second), acting over several years, can cause the asteroid to miss the Earth entirely. However, the trick is to gently nudge the asteroid out of harm’s way and not to blow it up. This latter option, though popular in the movies, only creates a bigger problem when all the pieces encounter the Earth. Another option that has been discussed includes the establishment of large solar sails on a small threatening object so that the pressure of sunlight could eventually redirect the object away from its predicted Earth collision.

No one should be overly concerned about an Earth impact of an asteroid or comet. The threat to any one person from auto accidents, disease, other natural disasters and a variety of other problems is much higher than the threat from NEOs. Over long periods of time, however, the chances of the Earth being impacted are not negligible so that some form of NEO insurance is warranted. At the moment, our best insurance rests with the NEO scientists and their efforts to first find these objects and then track their motions into the future. We need to first find them, then keep an eye on them.

You might be interested in
An iron ball is dropped onto a pavement from a height H. If half of the heat generated goes into warming the ball, find the temp
mr Goodwill [35]

The given question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows.

A 10 kg iron ball is dropped onto a pavement from a height of 100 m. If half of the heat generated goes into warming the ball,find the temperature increase of the ball. (In Sl units, the specific heat capacity of iron is 450 J/kg.C degree).

Explanation:

In the given case, when the ball comes in contact with the pavement then its kinetic energy will be equal to potential energy of the ball before it was dropped. Half the K.E heats the ball.

As K.E = P.E = mgh

So, mgh = 10 \times 10 \times 100 = 10,000 joules

And, half of this is 5,000 joules

As we know that

             Q = m \times C \Delta T

          5000 = 450 \times 10 \times \Delta T

\Delta T = \frac{5000}{4500}

              = 1.11 degrees

Also, in the given situation

          \frac{mgh}{2} = m \times C \times \Delta T

Since there is an m on both sides of the equation, we will divide both sides by m  and the resulting equation will be as follows.

        \frac{gh}{2} = c \times \Delta t

As, the result is independent of mass which is why the result is the same for any ball of any mass.

4 0
4 years ago
To determine the concentration of ethanol in cognac a 5.00 mL sample of the cognac is diluted to 0.500 L. Analysis of the dilute
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer : The molar concentration of ethanol in the undiluted cognac is 8.44 M

Explanation :

Using neutralization law,

M_1V_1=M_2V_2

where,

M_1 = molar concentration of undiluted cognac = ?

M_2 = molar concentration of diluted cognac = 0.0844 M

V_1 =  volume of undiluted cognac = 5.00 mL = 0.005 L

V_2 = volume of diluted cognac = 0.500 L

Now put all the given values in the above law, we get molar concentration of ethanol in the undiluted cognac.

M_1\times 0.005L=0.0844M\times 0.500L

M_1=8.44M

Therefore, the molar concentration of ethanol in the undiluted cognac is 8.44 M

4 0
4 years ago
what are the three current biggest sources of electrical energy? i need to select three choices A. nuclear powerB. hydroelectric
tigry1 [53]

All of them are the current biggest sources of electrical energy.

3 of them will be explained.

------------------------

1) Natural gas:

it was the largest source, 38 % approx., of the USA electricity generation. It is used in steam turbines and gas turbines to generate electricity.

----------------------

2) Nuclear energy:

It was the source of 19% of the U.S. electricity generation in 2021. Nuclear power plants use steam turbines to produce electricity from fission.

---------------------

3) Coal power:

It was the 2nd.-largest energy source for US electricity generation in 2021.

5 0
1 year ago
1. The chemical formula for sodium bromide iş NaB. *<br> True<br> False
zheka24 [161]
The answer is False for sodium bromide it would be NaBr
3 0
3 years ago
Find the density of an object that has a mass of 28 grams and a volume of 2 points<br> 38.6 cm^3. *
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

<h2>0.73 g/cm³</h2>

Explanation:

The density of a substance can be found by using the formula

density =  \frac{mass}{volume}  \\

From the question we have

density =  \frac{28}{38.6}  \\  =0.72538...

We have the final answer as

<h3>0.73 g/cm³</h3>

Hope this helps you

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A liquid that occupies a volume of 9.0 L has a mass of 7.2 kg. What is the density of the liquid in kg/L
    13·1 answer
  • The density of gold is 19.3 g/ml. what is the volume of a gold nugget that weighs 93.5 g?
    15·2 answers
  • Help me please!!
    8·1 answer
  • Which is warmer 10c or 30f
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the structure of an Atom (HELP!)
    14·1 answer
  • How many moles are in 1.05 g of gold (Au)?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a characteristic of an S wave?
    7·1 answer
  • Consider the Bohr Model of Phosphorus below. Which statement is FALSE?
    5·1 answer
  • Is there a systemic racial bias that is associated with Climate Change?
    6·1 answer
  • List three atoms or ions that have the same number of
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!