This is a depreciation method based on units of production.
The formula for this method is:
(original cost of equipment - salvage value) / number of units expected during useful life
Answer:
$1,439,600 $780,400 − $84,000 + $743,200 = $1,439,600; the non-recurring loss is already included in income from continuing operations is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
The team earns $405 in revenue for each game and $2430 revenue each season. With total costs of $3300 each season, the team finishes the season with $ -870 of profit
Explanation:
TEAM EARNS $ 10 FOR EACH TICKET AND 30 PEOPLE ATTEND A GAME AND SPEND $7 ON CONCESSION STAND BUT TEAM RECEIVE ONLY $ 3.5 OUT OF THIS SO
PER CUSTOMER REVENUE OF TEAM= $13.5
TOTAL REVENUE PER GAME = 13.5 * 30= $405
FOR A SEASON OF 6 GAMES, TOTAL REVENUE= 405* 6=$2430
PROFIT = REVENUE- COST= 2430- 3300 = -870 $
THAT MEANS LOSS OF 870 $
The team earns $405 in revenue for each game and $2430 revenue each season. With total costs of $..3300...... each season, the team finishes the season with $ -870 of profit or loss of $870
Answer:
When comparing the real estate market of any region or state, there are factors for consideration:
a) Population size
b) Employment status
c) Real estate market
d) Renting strength
e) Price
f) Quality in terms of home structure and a serene environment.
Explanation:
In the question, there are two American cities up for comparison: The city of Pittsburgh and the Philadelphia city, both in the Pennsylvania region. Both cities have comfortable environments which are habitable but here, we have to choose or rather compare both. The first factor is the population size. The two cities which are in the same region, have a considerable population size but when compared, Philadelphia has the upper hand. In real estate business, population is key as a region which a better and fuller population is appreciated more. The second factor is the employment status of the inhabitants. The employment status of these two cities are commendable but Pittsburgh is quite flabbergasting. The employment rate of Pittsburgh to Philadelphia is up to 57%. Employment status is a key determinant when real estate market is mentioned because employed persons are the ones who can actually pay when due. The third factor is the real estate market. This is another factor which is very important in determining the cities' real estate market. Over the years, Philadelphia has shown positive signs of a healthy real estate market which nicks that of Pittsburgh. Other factors listed above have clearly been favourable to Philadelphia because of their location but in terms of price, Pittsburgh appears cheaper with an average price of $1258 compared to Philadelphia's $1,652.
Answer:
C) limited; unlimited
Explanation:
Economics can be described as the study of how people use limited resources to satisfy unlimited wants.
