The main consequence was the deconstruction of society. For Putnam, in order to have a fully functioning society, it is necessary to have social interaction. If you don't then you will alienate yourself and if everyone does that then a valid society can't be built and the society could crumble.
Answer:
An individual, forced to endure negative stimuli, becomes unable to avoid this stimulus.
Explanation:
Learned helplessness happens when a creature is over and overexposed to an aversive improvement that it cannot get away. Inevitably, the creature will quit attempting to maintain a strategic distance from the development and carry on as though it is defenseless to change the circumstance. In any event, when chances to escape are exhibited, this educated vulnerability will anticipate any activity.
At the point when individuals feel that they do not influence their circumstances, they may start to carry on in a powerless way. This inaction can lead individuals to disregard open doors for help or change.
The first clue is the fact that it says it is read
This eliminates radio and television.
It also says readers can email and that it is relevant today.
More people are using technology today.
This means that the answer is B
ONLINE MEDIA
vote brainliest if I helped ! :)
Answer:
Robert Nozick entitlement theory is a theory of justice.
Explanation:
According to Nozick, the important part is how people got what they have. The result of the distribution of goods is not essential.The three basic principles of Nozick 's theory are:-
1. A 'principle of justice' in 'acquisition':- According to this, this is justification of how people own the common property.
2. A 'principle of justice' in 'transfer':- In this principle it is explained how one can acquire assets from another including gifts .
3. A 'principle of rectification' of 'injustice':- This principle explains that if there are any assets that are acquired unfairly, how can victim request for justice, how can it be rectified.
These principles are closely aligned with 'libertarian theory'.
Answer:
<u>1) Why did the critics assign this derogatory term to Henri and his followers?</u>
Because the Ashcan School was creating an art form that portraits the day by day life of ordinary and humble people, and the detractors didn't believe that this was important. The term 'Ashcan' was often used, before the formation of this art movement, to describe art forms that were not understood or accepted by the audience. An ordinary art form.
<u>2) How was realism of this twentieth-century group different from realistic representation of the nineteenth-century?</u>
Because the members of the Ashcan School were focusing to portrait the urban life, while the 19th century realism wanted to do the opposite, choosing to paint the natural elements.
<u>3) Select a work of art by one of the followers of the Ashcan School and one of the nineteenth-century realistic paintings to illustrate your discussion.</u>
For this question, I think that the paintings you need to choose to ilustrate must contrast the ideas of these groups (Ashcan School and the traditional realism). Then, I believe that 'Hester Street' executed in 1905 by George Luks is a good choice, because it's portraits excacly what the Ashcan School wanted to do with art. On the other hand, 'The Cotton Pickers' (1876) or 'Long Branch, New Jersey' (1869), both executed by Winslow Homer, are a good counter argument.
Explanation:
