Answer:
2). As x-> -∞, f(x)->∞
As x-> ∞, f(x)-> -∞
5). As x-> -∞, f(x)-> -∞
As x-> ∞, f(x)-> ∞
3). As x-> -∞, f(x)-> -∞
As x-> ∞, f(x)-> ∞
6). As x-> -∞, f(x)-> ∞
As x-> ∞, f(x)-> ∞
Step-by-step explanation:
I just watched a quick video so you can't completely trust me, but i tried my best. Hopefully someone more trustworthy for this comes in.
Answer: 2/3^3
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the volume of a box, you use the formula, Lenth*Width*Height=Volume
The Lenth is 3 1/2. The width is 1 1/3 and the height is 2/14
Plug the values in formula
3 1/2*1 1/3*2/14
Covert the mixed numbers into imporper fractions so it is easier to solve
3 1/2=7/2
1 1/3=4/3
7/2*4/3*2/14
Reduce 2/14
2/14=1/7
7/2*4/3*1/7=7*4*1/(2*3*7)=28/42
Reduce 28/42=14/21=2/3
2/3 ft^3
Answer:
m∠P ≅ m∠L; this can be confirmed by translating point P to point L.
Step-by-step explanation:
Angle angle (AA) similarity postulate state that two triangles are similar if two of their corresponding angle is similar. The corresponding angle for each point of the triangles will be:
∠L=∠P
∠Q=∠M
∠N=∠R
Since the 2nd triangle made from dilation, it should maintain its orientation.
Option 1 is true, ∠P corresponds to ∠L. If you move/translate point P to point L, you can confirm it because their orientation is the same.
Option 2 is false, the triangle will be similar if ∠P=∠N but you can't confirm it with translation alone.
Option 3 and 4 definitely wrong because it speaking about length, not the angle.
Answer:
The inequality for 
is:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Width of rectangle = 3 ft
Height or length of rectangle = 
ft
Perimeter is at least 300 ft
To write an inequality for .
Solution:
Perimeter of a rectangle is given as:
⇒ 
where 
represents length of the rectangle and 
represents the width of the rectangle.
Plugging in the given values in the formula, the perimeter can be given as:
⇒ 
Using distribution:
⇒ 
Simplifying.
⇒ 
The perimeter is at lest 300 ft. So, the inequality can be given as:
⇒ 
Solving for
Subtracting both sides by 16.
⇒ 
⇒ 
Dividing both sides by 2.
⇒ 
⇒ (Answer)
Answer:
119
Step-by-step explanation:
Divided by x and y for total engagement of relationship between two beings of equation.
