Answer: Sunk Cost fallacy
Explanation:
The sunk cost can be defined as the cost that has already been incurred and cannot be refunded back. It is in contrasted to the prospective costs which are the costs of future and that can be saved if any action is needed.
The economist argue that the sunk cost has nothing to do with the future rational decision making.
The example of such situation is fees which is once spent is generally not refunded.
Are there answer choices? It's kind of hard forming your own answer with this question. :)
Answer:
The main difference between diagnoses is that anorexia nervosa is a syndrome of self-starvation involving significant weight loss of 15 percent or more of ideal body weight, whereas patients with bulimia nervosa are, by definition, at normal weight or above.
Explanation:
I think this doesn’t make her a p3do. a p3do is someone who is older, preying on minors and younger children I believe
