1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena L [17]
3 years ago
5

1. What is the mass of an object moving at 13 m/s and having 3042 J of kinetic energy?​

Physics
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: 36 Kg

Explanation:

Ke= 1/2MV^2

Plug in the kinectic energy (3042 J) and solve for M.

3042= 1/2 (M) (13^2)

M= 36 Kg

You might be interested in
A charge Q is transferred from an initially uncharged plastic ball to an identical ball 17 cm away. The force of attraction is t
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

2.92 x 10¹² electrons

Explanation:

given,

distance between two plastic ball, r = 17 cm

                                      r = 0.17 m

Force of attraction = F = 68 mN

                F = 0.068 N

number of electron transferred from one ball to another.

using Coulomb Force equation

F = \dfrac{kq^2}{r^2}

0.068 = \dfrac{9\times 10^9\times q^2}{0.17^2}

q² = 2.1835 x 10⁻¹³

q = 4.67 x 10⁻⁷ C

now, number of electron

 N = \dfrac{q}{e}

e is the charge of electron which is equal to 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C

  N = \dfrac{4.67\times 10^{-7}}{1.6\times 10^{-19}}

       N = 2.92 x 10¹² electrons

electrons were transferred from one ball to the other is 2.92 x 10¹²

5 0
4 years ago
An object traveling around another object in space is in
drek231 [11]
It is orbiting the object.
8 0
4 years ago
A boy jogs 250 meters in 110s what is the average speed
Artyom0805 [142]
The rule to get the average speed is as follows:
average speed = average distance / average time

We are given that:
distance = 250 m
time = 110 sec

Substitute with the givens in the above equation to get the average speed as follows:
average speed = 250/110 = 25/11 meters/sec
3 0
3 years ago
Why is the Earth generally warmer at the equator than at the poles?
Elenna [48]
Because of the earths curve and temperature. The temperature in an area depends on the amount of the Sun's energy reaching the surface in that area. The equator tilts closer to the sun than the poles do. I hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Date
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Because Kinetic Energy(KE) is not the same as Momentum(P)

Kinetic Energy is a scalar(has magnitude only). For a body of mass M, velocity V:

KE = 0.5MV^2

The units of KE: Joules.

Energy is the ability to do work.

Momentum is not a form of energy.

Momentum is a vector(has magnitude and direction).

P = MV

Units of momentum: kg m/s

If you have rifles of mass 2, 4, 8, 16 kg, using the same cartridge, with the same load, barrel length(remember momentum of projectile is proportional to velocity), they all have the same recoil momentum.

But the kinetic energy of recoil would be inversely proportional to the mass of the gun.

Thus the 2kg gun(possible even in large powerful calibers due to modern materials like titanium etc), would have 8 times the recoil ENERGY of the 16kg gun.

A lot of confusion exists in America because of retention of old units, namely Foot Pounds(force) for KE, and Pounds(mass) Feet Per Second for Momentum(P). Because of the more awkward momentum units, a lot of old books had a bad habit of calling the momentum units Pounds Feet, leaving out the rest. Naturally this created confusion with Foot Pounds. Multiplication being commutative and all that:).

Remember that the momentum of the rifles is the same. But the ones with the highest recoil energy hurt the most.

Speaking of hurt:

If momentum killed, then consider two dinosaur killer asteroids with the same masses and velocities, striking vertically at the same time antipodal points on the Earth’s surface. Total momentum delivered would be Zero. That would not make us safe at all:)

Similarly, being shot simultaneously at close range from opposite sides with a 5 round burst from each from two M4 assault rifles(by definition must be able to fire full auto) delivered in 0.3 seconds, would deliver zero momentum. But not zero harm.

Also, the recoil momentum of any firearm is equal to the mass of projectile x velocity + mass of propellant x exit velocity of propellant. This is obviously greater, often much greater, depending on range, than the striking momentum of the projectile at the target.

The recoil kinetic energy is vastly less than the kinetic energy of the bullet/projectile. Neglecting propellant contribution:

recoil Momentum = bullet momentum

BUT:

recoil KE/bullet KE = projectile mass/gun mass

This is a very small fraction.

If we consider the M4 carried by American military:

M855(SS109 equivalent) 5.56 bullet of mass 0.004kg(62 grains)is fired from M4 assault rifle of mass, with optic and full mag 4kg, a thousand times as much!

Even allowing for the 0.0015kg powder charge, and the higher velocity of the powder(approx 1400=1500 m/s vs approx 900 m/s muzzle velocity of the bullet), the recoil energy is hundreds of times less than the muzzle energy of the bullet.

That’s why you want to be behind the gun, and not in front.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Well into the twentieth century, many scientists believed the ocean floor was
    6·1 answer
  • Match the words from the choices below
    10·2 answers
  • During a balloon ascension, wearing an oxygen mask, you measure the weight of a calibrated 2.00-kg mass and find that the value
    14·1 answer
  • A car is travelling to the right with a speed of 42 m/s when the driver slams on the brakes the car skids 4.0 second
    5·1 answer
  • What is Archimedes' Principle?
    9·1 answer
  • Which sequence shows electromagnetic waves arranged from shorter to longer wavelengths?. A. visible light, infrared radiation, m
    13·2 answers
  • Complete the statement below with all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Question 17 of 25
    10·2 answers
  • Which event happens in a solar cell when the photoelectric effect occurs?
    8·1 answer
  • Evaluating alternative options and choosing one option among them is called the theory of bounded rationality.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!