1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
3 years ago
7

Date

Physics
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Because Kinetic Energy(KE) is not the same as Momentum(P)

Kinetic Energy is a scalar(has magnitude only). For a body of mass M, velocity V:

KE = 0.5MV^2

The units of KE: Joules.

Energy is the ability to do work.

Momentum is not a form of energy.

Momentum is a vector(has magnitude and direction).

P = MV

Units of momentum: kg m/s

If you have rifles of mass 2, 4, 8, 16 kg, using the same cartridge, with the same load, barrel length(remember momentum of projectile is proportional to velocity), they all have the same recoil momentum.

But the kinetic energy of recoil would be inversely proportional to the mass of the gun.

Thus the 2kg gun(possible even in large powerful calibers due to modern materials like titanium etc), would have 8 times the recoil ENERGY of the 16kg gun.

A lot of confusion exists in America because of retention of old units, namely Foot Pounds(force) for KE, and Pounds(mass) Feet Per Second for Momentum(P). Because of the more awkward momentum units, a lot of old books had a bad habit of calling the momentum units Pounds Feet, leaving out the rest. Naturally this created confusion with Foot Pounds. Multiplication being commutative and all that:).

Remember that the momentum of the rifles is the same. But the ones with the highest recoil energy hurt the most.

Speaking of hurt:

If momentum killed, then consider two dinosaur killer asteroids with the same masses and velocities, striking vertically at the same time antipodal points on the Earth’s surface. Total momentum delivered would be Zero. That would not make us safe at all:)

Similarly, being shot simultaneously at close range from opposite sides with a 5 round burst from each from two M4 assault rifles(by definition must be able to fire full auto) delivered in 0.3 seconds, would deliver zero momentum. But not zero harm.

Also, the recoil momentum of any firearm is equal to the mass of projectile x velocity + mass of propellant x exit velocity of propellant. This is obviously greater, often much greater, depending on range, than the striking momentum of the projectile at the target.

The recoil kinetic energy is vastly less than the kinetic energy of the bullet/projectile. Neglecting propellant contribution:

recoil Momentum = bullet momentum

BUT:

recoil KE/bullet KE = projectile mass/gun mass

This is a very small fraction.

If we consider the M4 carried by American military:

M855(SS109 equivalent) 5.56 bullet of mass 0.004kg(62 grains)is fired from M4 assault rifle of mass, with optic and full mag 4kg, a thousand times as much!

Even allowing for the 0.0015kg powder charge, and the higher velocity of the powder(approx 1400=1500 m/s vs approx 900 m/s muzzle velocity of the bullet), the recoil energy is hundreds of times less than the muzzle energy of the bullet.

That’s why you want to be behind the gun, and not in front.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

It's c the last one u see

8 0
2 years ago
You purchase a ten-year 1,000 bond with semiannual coupons for 982. The bond has a 1,100 redemption payment at maturity, a nomin
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

6 0
3 years ago
how is the position of electrons involved in metallic bonding different from the position of electrons that form ionic and coval
Yuri [45]
While ionic bonds join metals to nonmetals, and covalent bonds join nonmetals to nonmetals, metallic bonds are responsible for the bondingbetween metal atoms. In metallic bonds, the valence electrons from the s and p orbitals of the interacting metal atoms delocalize.

I hope that this answer helps you out
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is formed by constructive erosion? 1. delta 2. gully 3. rill 4. glacier
lana [24]
1. Delta, is formed by constructive erosion.
7 0
3 years ago
Name one reason why you should pour milk in before cereal.
krok68 [10]

Answer:

splashing

Explanation:

if you put in the cereal after the milk it will splash everywhere, causing a waste of milk, and a loss of time.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the kinetic of a 0.1 kilogram toy truck moving at a speed of 1.1 meters per second
    8·1 answer
  • The object falls faster at the pole then the equator why​
    5·1 answer
  • The average kinetic energy of particles in an object is also known as _________.
    8·1 answer
  • You are in a speedboat on a river moving in the same direction as the current. The speedometer on the boat shows that its speed
    7·1 answer
  • A statue falls into a pond a gardener states that the volume of the statue can be estimated by measuring the new water level exp
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements are true regarding transformers?Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • Find avrage speed for a horse that traveled east 25 km in 4 hours
    8·1 answer
  • How much gravitational force do two lead balls with a mass of 8 kilograms, the centers of mass of which are 17 cm apart, affect
    11·1 answer
  • What happens to homeostasis as we get older?
    11·1 answer
  • Today, you will use the Magnetic Fields Simulation to collect more reliable data about the two
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!