Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
Answer:
The best explanation for this phenomenon is <u>PRIMING</u>
Explanation:
Primingcould be defined as a technique in which the introduction of one stimulus influences how people respond to a subsequent stimulus. Priming works by activating an association or representation in memory just before another stimulus or task is introduced.
Priming is the process by which perception or experience of an item (or person or event) leads to an increase in its accessibility and the accessibility of related material and behaviors. therefore priming is what happens when exposure to some thing influences the behavior of an individual later on, without that individual being aware that the first thing is guiding their behavior to a certain extent.
The person was exposed to a scary movie which latter affected his behaviour when he witnessed an argument which he probably think will end in a fight.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
They are taking action to improve/reform
According to Freud, this is Reaction Formation.
Another example can serve men that are prejudice against homosexuals are actually making a defense against their own homosexual feelings.
