The difference between Tucker and Karly's take is that Tucker's solution is analytical while Karly's is graphical. But both are correct either way.
For Tucker's solution, let's say at x=-3 the value for y is 4, and at x=3, the value of y is still 4, then the average rate of change or slope is 0. Note that the slope of the curve is Δy/Δx. Since there is no change for Δy, the slope is zero.
For Karly's solution, even if the curve travels high or low but would have the same elevation of x=-3 and x=3, the average rate of change is still zero. It is actually just same with Tucker's but Karly just verbalizes her solution that was observed visually.
Answer:
999
Step-by-step explanation:
X + 6.38 = 15.75<span> would be the answer
x=9.37
for the first option, you are not adding 15.75 and x together.
for the second option, it is correct, because in the problem, it is giving the operation, 15.75-6.38=x. when you turn it do inverse operation, you get </span><span>x + 6.38 = 15.75.
for the third option, it doesn't make sense and it's not doing what the problem is asking for.
for the fourth option, you are not multiplying. you are subtracting </span>15.75 by<span> 6.38 to get x.</span>
Answer:
1,200,000
Step-by-step explanation:
hope i helped
Total distance = 200 miles
Time needed for the first 100 miles
= 100 ÷ 40 = 2.5 hours
Time needed for the second 100 miles
= 100 ÷ 50 = 2 hours
Total time = 2.5 + 2 = 4.5 hours
Average speed = 200 ÷ 4.5 hours = 44.4 miles per hour
