Answer:
Option (c)
Explanation:
Both the bullets have same acceleration because they both falls under the influence of acceleration due to gravity.
The bullet which is fired from the gun has some initial velocity but the bullet which is dropped has zero initial velocity.
the acceleration is acting on both the bullets which is equal to the acceleration due to gravity and they both in motion in the influence of gravity.
It will be 4 times of original thus maximum speed would be 80cm/s
The variables which are involved in understanding Kepler's third law of
motion are
<h3 /><h3>What is Kepler's third law of motion?</h3>
Kepler's third law of motion states that the the square of the orbital period of
a planet is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit. He
also inferred that the greater the distance, the slower the orbital velocity.
This thereby makes option D the most appropriate option as it contains the
orbital velocity and distance to sun variables.
Read more about Kepler's third law of motion here brainly.com/question/777046
Answer:
The electromagnetic force
Explanation:
There are four fundamental forces in nature:
- Gravitational force: it is the force that acts between any particles having mass. It is relevant only on very large scales (planets, stars), since it is the weakest of the 4 forces, so very large masses are needed in order to produce relevant effects.
- Electromagnetic force: it is the force that acts between particles with electric charge. It can be attractive or repulsive. It is the main force that acts between atoms and molecules.
- Strong nuclear force: it is the force that keeps the protons and the neutrons together inside the nucleus. It acts only on very short scales (only within the nucleus of the atom)
- Weak nuclear force: it is the force responsible for the radioactive decays of certain nuclei. It also acts on very short scales.
Therefore, the force that is responsible for binding atoms together to form molecules is the electromagnetic force.
Answer:
a) Yes
b) No
Explanation:
In the first case, part a, yes we can say for certainty that cylinderical symmetry holds. Why so? You may ask. This is because from the question, we are told that the length of the rod is 300 cm. And this said length is longer than the distance to the point from the center of the rod, which is 5 cm.
In the second half of the question, I beg to disagree that cylindrical symmetry holds. Again, you may ask why, this is because the length of the rod in this case, is having the same order of magnitude as the distance to the center of the rod. Thus, it is not symmetrical.
