Montgomery - Alabama
Juneau - Alaska
Phoenix - Arizona
Little Rock - Arkansas
Sacramento - California
Denver - Colorado
Hartford - Connecticut
Dover - Delaware
Tallahassee - Florida
Atlanta - Georgia
Honolulu - Hawaii
Boise - Idaho
Springfield - Illinois
Indianapolis - Indiana
Des Moines - Iowa
Topeka - Kansas
Frankfort - Kentucky
Baton Rouge - Louisiana
Augusta - Maine
Annapolis - Maryland
Boston - Massachusetts
Lansing - Michigan
Saint Paul - Minnesota
Jackson - Mississippi
Jefferson - City Missouri
Helena - Montana
Lincoln - Nebraska
Carson City - Nevada
Concord - New Hampshire
Trenton - New Jersey
Santa Fe - New Mexico
Albany - New York
Raleigh - North Carolina
Bismarck - North Dakota
Columbus - Ohio
Oklahoma City - Oklahoma
Salem - Oregon
Harrisburg - Pennsylvania
Providence - Rhode Island
Columbia - South Carolina
Pierre - South Dakota
Nashville - Tennessee
Austin - Texas
Salt Lake City - Utah
Montpelier - Vermont
Richmond - Virginia
Olympia - Washington
Charleston - West Virginia
Madison - Wisconsin
Cheyenne - Wyoming
Answer: adaptation involves loss and change
Explanation: ADAPTATION can be defined as a change that is made or undergone to suit a condition or environment. In the transition model of adaption, the individual involved, experiences a form of loss before the change takes place.
Though I am answering this through logic and my knowledge on history. I would believe making colonies was the answer. Because of England's particular involvement with colonies. Colonies made loads of money especially with high taxes they imposed upon their colonies. England was not just out of money with a exploration route its upkeep for military and Empire grew. Its many wars took a toll on their coffers and the money vanished until colonies were "founded".
It was not fishing because England was already an island and fish was easily accessible and not a commodity. Entering the fur trade was not much of England's sights before the establishment of colonies so this is a trick answer. Looting Spanish ships? No. They had a huge navy and so did Spain. England were not pirates and looting Spanish ships would be called an act of war. Not really going to help the money situation. So making colonies helps. It checks all the things they want. Make Spain mad without an act of war, more food and commodities, which means more money. Making a world dominated empire that strikes fear into most countries. Being unrivaled for the most part is quite good in a dog eat dog world. Good thing England then became something larger than dogs.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Agenda setting priming
Explanation:
<u>Agenda setting and priming:</u>
The agenda-setting theory was given by Maxwell et.al. These terms were given to examined under abroad rang of media effects. Agenda setting theory focuses on to draw the eyes of the public about a hot topic for that the media set an agenda for the public. It is a type of creation attention by media for the public related to the specific topic The agenda-setting occurs in cognitive processing known as accessibility.
<u>Priming</u>:
It is a concept by which the media affect the perception of the public by providing perception to their mind so that they can make a decision that was based on the preconception that already stored in the memory of perception. Priming can be used during election time to choose the right candidate by the public.
Answer:
I Ching
Explanation:
I Ching usually translated as Book of Changes or Classic of Changes, is an ancient Chinese divination text and the oldest of the Chinese classics. it is a system that has always been used to predict the future. More importantly, though, it is also used as a book of wisdom. Because the readings it gives are simple, yet elegant, profound, and intuitive, it is often consulted for its advice and insight into human nature.
